Thursday, February 18, 2021

CORPORATE MEDIA COMPLETELY IGNORED THAT JOE EVEN SAID THIS!!

 

CNN Paid Leftist Who Stormed The Capitol $35,000, Corporate Media is FUNDING What They Call Terror (Tim Pool)




The important fact in this case is that Mr Sullivan actually incited violence at the Capitol and had invited other Antifa types who likely mixed with the crowd. How many of these violence advocating Antifa people showed up? What we need is background information on all those that incited violence, that fought with police, and damaged property when they stormed Capitol Building. One should not draw conclusions about what happened without further investigation. 

On the other hand Trump didn't incite the violence. He invited people to peacefully protest (which is evident if you listen to his entire speech and not the doctored and spliced together versions aired in the mainstream propaganda media). 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 19, 2021.]

The False and Exaggerated Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot

Steve Weathers tS9 ipgonfgshoeremdrs · Let's test this FB news ban .... (if I don't put up any link). ps. The New York Times had to issue a correction, but they stuck it on their old posts as an update. The one cop that died didn't die from being attacked there. The only people killed were protesters/rioters. The zip tie people apparently found the ties in the building (and the Feds agree with them). I think the media was trying to weaponise what happened to avoid talking about the vote counting issue (that is still largely unaddressed and pissed off a lot of people). The False and Exaggerated Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot - Glenn Greenwald. What took place at the Capitol on January 6 was undoubtedly a politically motivated riot. As such, it should not be controversial to regard it as a dangerous episode. Any time force or violence is introduced into what ought to be the peaceful resolution of political conflicts, it should be lamented and condemned. But none of that justifies lying about what happened that day, especially by the news media. Condemning that riot does not allow, let alone require, echoing false claims in order to render the event more menacing and serious than it actually was. There is no circumstance or motive that justifies the dissemination of false claims by journalists. The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods are. Yet this is exactly what has happened, and continues to happen, since that riot almost seven weeks ago. And anyone who tries to correct these falsehoods is instantly attacked with the cynical accusation that if you want only truthful reporting about what happened, then you’re trying to “minimize” what happened and are likely an apologist for if not a full-fledged supporter of the protesters themselves. One of the most significant of these falsehoods was the tale — endorsed over and over without any caveats by the media for more than a month — that Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by the pro-Trump mob when they beat him to death with a fire extinguisher. That claim was first published by The New York Times on January 8 in an article headlined “Capitol Police Officer Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Rampage.” It cited “two [anonymous] law enforcement officials” to claim that Sicknick died “with the mob rampaging through the halls of Congress” and after he “was struck with a fire extinguisher.” A second New York Times article from later that day — bearing the more dramatic headline: “He Dreamed of Being a Police Officer, Then Was Killed by a Pro-Trump Mob” — elaborated on that story ---------------------------------------------------------- After publication of these two articles, this horrifying story about a pro-Trump mob beating a police officer to death with a fire extinguisher was repeated over and over, by multiple journalists on television, in print, and on social media. It became arguably the single most-emphasized and known story of this event, and understandably so — it was a savage and barbaric act that resulted in the harrowing killing by a pro-Trump mob of a young Capitol police officer. It took on such importance for a clear reason: Sicknick’s death was the only example the media had of the pro-Trump mob deliberately killing anyone. In a January 11 article detailing the five people who died on the day of the Capitol protest, the New York Times again told the Sicknick story: “Law enforcement officials said he had been ‘physically engaging with protesters’ and was struck in the head with a fire extinguisher.” But none of the other four deaths were at the hands of the protesters: the only other person killed with deliberate violence was a pro-Trump protester, Ashli Babbitt, unarmed when shot in the neck by a police officer at close range. The other three deaths were all pro-Trump protesters: Kevin Greeson, who died of a heart attack outside the Capitol; Benjamin Philips, 50, “the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo,” who died of a stroke that day; and Rosanne Boyland, a fanatical Trump supporter whom the Times says was inadvertently “killed in a crush of fellow rioters during their attempt to fight through a police line.” This is why the fire extinguisher story became so vital to those intent on depicting these events in the most violent and menacing light possible. Without Sicknick having his skull bashed in with a fire extinguisher, there were no deaths that day that could be attributed to deliberate violence by pro-Trump protesters. Three weeks later, The Washington Post said dozens of officers (a total of 140) had various degrees of injuries, but none reported as life-threatening, and at least two police officers committed suicide after the riot. So Sicknick was the only person killed who was not a pro-Trump protester, and the only one deliberately killed by the mob itself. It is hard to overstate how pervasive this fire extinguisher story became. Over and over, major media outlets and mainstream journalists used this story to dramatize what happened ---------------------------------------------------------- After the media bombarded Americans with this story for a full month without pause, it took center stage at Trump’s impeachment process. As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy noted, the article of impeachment itself stated that “Trump supporters ‘injured and killed law enforcement personnel.’” The House impeachment managers explicitly claimed on page 28 of their pretrial memorandum that “the insurrectionists killed a Capitol Police officer by striking him in the head with a fire extinguisher.” Once the impeachment trial ended in an acquittal, President Joe Biden issued a statement and referenced this claim in the very first paragraph. Sicknick, said the President, lost “his life while protecting the Capitol from a violent, riotous mob on January 6, 2021.” The problem with this story is that it is false in all respects. From the start, there was almost no evidence to substantiate it. The only basis were the two original New York Times articles asserting that this happened based on the claim of anonymous law enforcement officials. Despite this alleged brutal murder taking place in one of the most surveilled buildings on the planet, filled that day with hundreds of cellphones taping the events, nobody saw video of it. No photographs depicted it. To this day, no autopsy report has been released. No details from any official source have been provided. Not only was there no reason to believe this happened from the start, the little that was known should have caused doubt. On the same day the Times published its two articles with the “fire extinguisher” story, ProPublica published one that should have raised serious doubts about it. The outlet interviewed Sicknick’s brother, who said that “Sicknick had texted [the family] Wednesday night to say that while he had been pepper-sprayed, he was in good spirits.” That obviously conflicted with the Times’ story that the mob “overpowered Sicknick” and “struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher,” after which, “with a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support.” But no matter. The fire extinguisher story was now a matter of lore. Nobody could question it. And nobody did: until after a February 2 CNN article that asked why nobody has been arrested for what clearly was the most serious crime committed that day: the brutal murder of Officer Sicknick with a fire extinguisher. Though the headline gave no hint of this, the middle of the article provided evidence which essentially declared the original New York Times story false: "In Sicknick's case, it's still not known publicly what caused him to collapse the night of the insurrection. Findings from a medical examiner's review have not yet been released and authorities have not made any announcements about that ongoing process. According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true." The CNN story speculates that perhaps Sicknick inhaled “bear spray,” but like the ProPublica interview with his brother who said he inhaled pepper spray, does not say whether it came from the police or protesters. It is also just a theory. CNN noted that investigators are “vexed by a lack of evidence that could prove someone caused his death as he defended the Capitol during last month's insurrection.” Beyond that, “to date, little information has been shared publicly about the circumstances of the death of the 13-year veteran of the police force, including any findings from an autopsy that was conducted by DC's medical examiner.” Few noticed this remarkable admission buried in this article. None of this was seriously questioned until a relatively new outlet called Revolver News on February 9 compiled and analyzed all the contradictions and lack of evidence in the prevailing story, after which Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, citing that article, devoted the first eight minutes of his February 10 program to examining these massive evidentiary holes. That caused right-wing media outlets to begin questioning what happened, but mainstream liberal outlets — those who spread the story aggressively in the first place — largely and predictably ignored it all. This week, the paper that first published the false story — in lieu of a retraction or an explanation of how and why it got the story wrong — simply went back to the first two articles, more than five weeks later, and quietly posted what it called an “update” at the top of both five-week-old articles. [Link deleted by me to the rest of the story. Google it if you want to finish reading this.]

Tuesday, February 16, 2021

Monday, February 8, 2021

CBS NEWS BLATANTLY LIES AND DOWNPLAYS THE NUMBER OF JOBS LOST DUE TO BIDEN EO

Unions that endorsed Joe Biden slam him for 'slashing thousands of jobs' by blocking Keystone XL pipeline

https://meaww.com/joe-biden-cancels-keystone-xl-pipeline-project-union-that-endorsed-him-upset-over-jobs-lost

U.S. lost more than 100,000 oil and gas jobs in coronavirus-driven bust
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/U-S-lost-more-than-100-000-oil-and-gas-jobs-in-15336253.php

T T
1 day ago
There are far more than 1000 workers out of work because of this.

13

RAZOR13
RAZOR13
1 day ago
They say that it will total over one hundred thousand jobs lost.

Hongo
Hongo
1 day ago (edited)
@RAZOR13 and those people have families. Half a million new people are now under the net of government welfare. this is what the dems want

3

hello there
hello there
1 day ago
@Hongo IF they give it to you, unemployment in most states is hard to get now because the states are at the fed money feed trough lapping it all up...they need to just give us all 2k a month until this ends..but you know the greed thing....so we all suffer...

ClubMayview
ClubMayview
1 day ago
10,000 and the downhill snowball will kill or diminish others.

4

John Galt
John Galt
1 day ago
I for one can't wait for gas to be $3.50 again so that the peasants stay off "MY" road. -t Bill Maher and my Step Fathers actual feelings no joke I wish I was joking.

Sunday, February 7, 2021

'My-pillow' Mike Lindell UNLEASHES on 'fake-news' Newsmax after the WALK-OFF scandal


Mike Lindell, Mary Fanning, and Brannon Howse Present the Docu-movie : "Absolute Proof" Exposing Election Fraud and the Theft of America by Enemies Foreign and Domestic. http://www.honestyvote.org/2021/02/mike-lindell-mary-fanning-and-brannon.html