Friday, October 26, 2018

Full Show: CNN Exposes Their Fake Bomb Fraud Like They Did in Syria

The news has become satire. It was only 6 months ago that CNN’s lies didn’t pass the sniff test when a reporter sniffed a backpack to test for nerve gas — and implied she smelled it. As “bombs” with timers were sent through the mail (think about it), CNN gave us pictures of the parody device and declared Trump was targeting his enemies. Even drone assassin John Brennan was raging about “violence”. Then, mainstream media’s most famous witch, Megyn Kelly, is burned at the stake at NBC.



Full Show: CNN Exposes Their Fake Bomb Fraud Like They Did in Syria

Related:

People Still Not Buying It:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2018/10/watch-live-patsy-arrested-in-pipe-bomb.html

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

NBC News Really Messed Up and Misrepresented Trump Talking About Robert E Lee and General Grant



NBC News Really Messed Up and Misrepresented Trump Talking About Robert E Lee and General Grant

Mr. Shadow
Daily reminder that progressivism poisons everything and socialism always ends in genocide and starvation also democracy is gang rape and NPC's never provide facts but always attempt to meme

Wednesday, October 3, 2018

Fake News Comes to Academia

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL:

The existence of a monthly journal focused on “feminist geography” is a sign of something gone awry in academia. The journal in question—Gender, Place & Culture—published a paper online in May whose author claimed to have spent a year observing canine sexual misconduct in Portland, Ore., parks.
The author admits that “my own anthropocentric frame” makes it difficult to judge animal consent. Still, the paper claims dog parks are “petri dishes for canine ‘rape culture’ ” and issues “a call for awareness into the different ways dogs are treated on the basis of their gender and queering behaviors, and the chronic and perennial rape emergency dog parks pose to female dogs.”
The paper was ridiculous enough to pique my interest—and rouse my skepticism, which grew in July with a report in Campus Reform by Toni Airaksinen. Author Helen Wilson had claimed to have a doctorate in feminist studies, but “none of the institutions that offers such a degree could confirm that she had graduated from their program,” Ms. Airaksinen wrote. In August Gender, Place & Culture issued an “expression of concern” admitting it couldn’t verify Ms. Wilson’s identity, though it kept the paper on its website.
All of this prompted me to ask my own questions. My email to “Helen Wilson” was answered by James Lindsay, a math doctorate and one of the real co-authors of the dog-park study. Gender, Place & Culture had been duped, he admitted. So had half a dozen other prominent journals that accepted fake papers by Mr. Lindsay and his collaborators—Peter Boghossian, an assistant professor of philosophy at Portland State University, and Helen Pluckrose, a London-based scholar of English literature and history and editor of AreoMagazine.com.
The three academics call themselves “left-leaning liberals.” Yet they’re dismayed by what they describe as a “grievance studies” takeover of academia, especially its encroachment into the sciences. “I think that certain aspects of knowledge production in the United States have been corrupted,” Mr. Boghossian says. Anyone who questions research on identity, privilege and oppression risks accusations of bigotry.
Beginning in August 2017, the trio wrote 20 hoax papers, submitting them to peer-reviewed journals under a variety of pseudonyms, as well as the name of their friend Richard Baldwin, a professor emeritus at Florida’s Gulf Coast State College. Mr. Baldwin confirms he gave them permission use his name. Journals accepted seven hoax papers. Four have been published.
This isn’t the first time scholars have used a hoax paper to make a point. In 1996 Duke University Press’s journal Social Text published a hoax submission by Alan Sokal, a mathematical physicist at New York University. Mr. Sokal, who faced no punishment for the hoax, told me he was “not oblivious to the ethical issues involved in my rather unorthodox experiment,” adding that “professional communities operate largely on trust; deception undercuts that trust.”
But he also said he was criticizing an academic subculture “that typically ignores (or disdains) reasoned criticism from the outside.” He concluded: “How can one show that the emperor has no clothes? Satire is by far the best weapon; and the blow that can’t be brushed off is the one that’s self-inflicted.” Messrs. Lindsay and Boghossian were already known for a hoax paper titled “The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct,” which they published in the journal Cogent Social Sciences last year under the names Jamie Lindsay and Peter Boyle.

More at the Wall Street Journal

http://fakenewsinvasion.blogspot.com