Friday, November 17, 2017

Thursday, November 16, 2017

Monday, November 13, 2017

"Fake News" Makes the Collins Dictionary Word of the Year - A Reaction

The term "Fake News" is the Collins Dictionary Word of the Year for 2017.

Mainstream media, in covering this story, reported that Donald Trump wrongly used the term against their organisations, that "Fake News" applies primarily to 'dubious' online sources, and that Trump is using it to deflect against criticism of his Presidency. However, Trump is, more often than not, correct in his usage against the mainstream press. The corporate media, as pointed out via a myriad of online sources, has a long history of being dishonest. It's not the online media that is the king of Fake News, it's the mainstream media.

It's important to note it is not simply a matter of taking the word of the alternative press at face value when it comes to their reporting - the leading online media outlets DIRECTLY SHOW the audience the nature of the mainstream lies so there can be no question.

If one considers the dictionary's definition of the term: ‘fake news’ that means “false, often sensational, information disseminated under the guise of news reporting” one can easily see how the definition DOES fit the mainstream press.

The term was first used at the end of the 2016 Presidential campaign to smear and essentially ring fence alterative media reporting that had been highlighting the bias and untruths the mainstream media used in helping Hillary Clinton throughout the election process.

The issue we face is that the mainstream media, on matters of war and high level cronyism, is a type of controlled opposition. They frame the debate and consequently your thoughts, concerning selected issues, and are especially active in this regard when it comes to Presidential campaigns. They protect the upper levels of a corrupted system (ie the owners and controllers of wealth and power in the USA).

The various terms used to describe the mainstream press help one understand how and why they operate (as censorship and debate controlling tools) and for whom. This media is know as the corporate press (the are owned and have loyalty to their sponsors), the establishment media (influenced by high level political bodies/lobbyists), the Mockingbird Media (where we have a record of strong media ties and interactions with the intelligence community), and where journalists and editors are often referred to as "presstitutes".

The tentacles of the controlled press also extend into the online alternative media via compromised individuals (moles/ideologues) and via money (sponsorship). This invites varying levels of (including self) censorship, that omits important information, includes outright lying and/or distortions - all of which changes the public perception (just as the mainstream does, although under the veneer of a more critical eye when it comes to certain pet issues that go beyond what the corporate press covers).

As a whole the controlled media creates a false sense of reality. They set the parameters when it comes to public discourse, steering the majority of people away from taboo topics that would expose a highly corrupted establishment.

Because of decades acting as the perceived information authority figure, the trusted mainstream media has this psychological advantage that they can use to hoodwink the public and push whatever spin they desire knowing that the vast majority of the population has neither the time and interest to independently check what they say. They can air stories that omit other views, run with incomplete facts, or push lies from unreliable sources, and people will assume they've done due diligence on the story.

The danger from the alternative media is that it can directly connect with the public and challenge the monopoly held by the mainstream press. They expose the deceptions and undermine their ability to control people's thoughts. This is why an attempt was made to smear the alternative press as "Fake News". The powers that be failed because reality bit them in the arse/ass. When they used the term "Fake News" they overstepped their ability to project propaganda.

For propaganda to work people have to sense that what is being pushed is true. In the case of the US Presidential election many people didn't buy what was being sold. They knew for a fact that the US economy was doing poorly, which was what Trump was telling them, and so their gambit - that things were already great - failed. In the 21st Century, facts on the ground still matter. Furthermore, people ARE turning online to discover things for themselves. Everything is online. People are directly connected via their smart phones. This is the new reality. People don't even have to go searching when it comes to gaining insights on politically charged issues either, especially as social media puts contradictory information right in their laps.

The alternative media in the online age has made a mockery of mainstream media's biased narrative, showing up their ties to corporate and military-industrial interests. It is no wonder that their smear of "Fake News" was easily turned against them.


Spook

Related:

The Truth About Fake News - PJW


Alternative to What? The BFP Roundtable Dissects the "Alternative" Media


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 10th, 2017.]

MSNBC, New York Times Make Hit Piece Against YouTuber ET Williams, Possibly Got His Channel Deleted

Just when you think that the mainstream media can’t get any lower, any dirtier, any grimier… they prove you wrong. Every single time. This time is no different. They have attacked conservative YouTuber E.T. Williams. He is very popular on YouTube and claims to have amassed over 200 million views over the course of 8 years. What sparked this whole situation is a writer for the New York Times by the name of Kevin Roose writing an article that centered around him. Not only was the article at hit piece against Williams, it was also a hit piece against people who talk about news on YouTube. Maybe the piece was a hit on YouTube itself. In the article, Roose describes E.T. Williams and other YouTubers as a “conservative shock jocks” who peddle “false stores.” The crux of the piece actually centers around YouTube itself and how they allow people like Williams - and others - to exist. He brings up the issue of YouTube’s algorithim… saying that YouTubers “game” the system by being very quick to upload reactions (what he refers to many times as “conspiracy theories”), before “reputable news sources” do. MSNBC and New York Times represent the old media. So it seems natural that Kevin Roose goes on national TV with Chris Hayes to discuss the article. Many inflammatory terms were used. The aforementioned “shock jock” … “misinformation” … “false speculation” (a term that doesn’t make any sense) and much more. Roose did speak to Williams on the phone before he penned his hit piece… but he did not have him on the MSNBC show alongside him and Chris Hayes to really talk about the issues. The worst part about it all is that it seemed like Roose got a feeling of joy about feeling responsible for E.T. Williams’ channel taken down. Sounds like hate and sure looks like it.


MSNBC, New York Times Make Hit Piece Against YouTuber ET Williams, Possibly Got His Channel Deleted

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

The Moron Media Is Still Clinging to the Russian DNC Leak Lie



The Moron Media Is Still Clinging to the Russian DNC Leak Lie

Related:

100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities: 

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html

The View Panel Refuses To Allow Meghan McCain To Talk About Hillary Clinton



The View Panel Refuses To Allow Meghan McCain To Talk About Hillary Clinton

Related:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/search?q=criminal+hillary

100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities: 

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html

MSNBC's Joy Reid & Panel Lie About Donna Brazile & Democratic Primary



MSNBC's Joy Reid & Panel Lie About Donna Brazile & Democratic Primary

Related:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/search?q=rigged+primaries

100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html

CNN "Fish Feeding" Story Goes FULL LIBTARD πŸ˜‚



CNN "Fish Feeding" Story Goes FULL LIBTARD πŸ˜‚

Related:


20 CNN Fake News Compilation! (PROOF) by debunkerbuster
CNN's greatest "Fake news" Compilation... by debunkerbuster
CNN Owned Compilation #1 by debunkerbuster

‘Fake News’ Being Weaponized To Censor Infowars

The House Intelligence Committee grilled tech industry leaders including Google and Twitter over “Russian interference” in social media during the 2016 Election, citing Infowars as a main culprit of “fake news.” Paul Joseph Watson joins Alex Jones to break it down.



‘Fake News’ Being Weaponized To Censor Infowars

Monday, November 6, 2017

CNN Makes Up Fake Story About Trump Dumping Food Into A Koi Pond Haphazardly in Japan #KoiGate

President Trump and Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe carried on an old tradition of feeding carp at a Koi pond in Tokyo when CNN and the rest of the mainstream media decided to twist the narrative to make Trump appear like a buffoon.

Liberal network CNN ran a ridiculous headline, “Trump feeds fish, winds up pouring entire box of food into Koi pond,” complete with a misleading tweet from reporter Veronica Rocha that only shows the Trump dumping the entire box of food. Her footage is conveniently edited to skip Abe doing the same thing.

IN fact, Abe dumped his entire box of fish food into the pond and Trump followed while the Prime Minister of Japan smiled. However, the anti-Trump media has been cropping the video to only show Trump’s actions.



CNN Makes Up Fake Story About Trump Dumping Food Into A Koi Pond Haphazardly in Japan #KoiGate

Saturday, November 4, 2017

David Knight Breaks Down the Clinton Russian Collusion Uranium One Scandal - Desperate Cover Up: MSNBC's Joy Reid Outright Lies About Uranium One & Hillary Clinton




David Knight Breaks Down the Clinton Russian Collusion Uranium One Scandal - Desperate Cover Up: MSNBC's Joy Reid Outright Lies About Uranium One & Hillary Clinton

Related:

100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities: 

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html

Friday, October 27, 2017

MSNBC Ignores Clinton Scandals & Makes Up Fake News About Trump & Wikileaks



RocketSurgeon 4 hours ago
So.. if you hire a caterer.. and they try to unsuccessfully buy Russian caviar from a wholesaler.. then you yourself are colluding with Russia? That is the basic claim, right? A business entity you hired to work for you, wanted to work (but couldn't) with some other business.. who might have at one time sold Russian produced goods to completely different people. And THAT is somehow bombshell evidence? ..and they're even using the "we have no evidence of ANY of these things we claim, which is evidence that it's real, because people always hide the evidence".. the state of modern "journalism" really makes me want to cry sometimes.


MSNBC Ignores Clinton Scandals & Makes Up Fake News About Trump & Wikileaks

Related:

100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities: 

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html

Thursday, October 26, 2017

Fake media and Hilary supporter, aren't you embarrassed?



Fake media and Hilary supporter, aren't you embarrassed?

Related:

Bullsh*t 'Russian Collusion' Narrative Collapses - Mueller Invested In Hedge Fund Linked To Russia, DNC Funded Fake Dossier - Clinton and the DNC Funded the Russia Dossier: There Goes the Russia Narrative!:

http://mindtreasury.blogspot.com/2017/10/mueller-invested-in-hedge-fund-linked.html

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

CNN Mocks Trump For Helping Polio Survivor Up Stairs

One of CNN's scumbag reporters mocked President Trump for helping Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who is a polio survivor up some stairs at the White House following a meeting at the Rose Garden. The "reporter" was completely clueless as to McConnell's illness and how it affects him. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/...



CNN Mocks Trump For Helping Polio Survivor Up Stairs

Related:

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

CNN Achieves Ultimate Fake News Status, Claims George Soros Was Not A Nazi Collaborator



CNN Achieves Ultimate Fake News Status, Claims George Soros Was Not A Nazi Collaborator

Fake Newsers Covered Up #HarveyWeinstein Rapes and Refuse to Abandon the Las Vegas Lone Wolf Fantasy



Fake Newsers Covered Up #HarveyWeinstein Rapes and Refuse to Abandon the Las Vegas Lone Wolf Fantasy

Related:

Explosive Harvey Weinstein PREDATOR Claims; Is Pizzagate Still "Fake"? - John Podesta is a Bad Man:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/10/explosive-harvey-weinstein-predator.html

Truth Teller's Radio Episode 7 - Las Vegas 2nd Gunman, Liberation from the Media, and Trumped!: How Tweets, Trolls, and Memes Won the Presidency for Donald Trump:

https://truthtellersradio.blogspot.com/2017/10/las-vegas-2nd-gunman-liberation-from.html

Saturday, September 30, 2017

CNN Finally Discovers ‘Proof’ of Russia Connection πŸ˜‚ - The Latest Preposterous Russian Witch Hunt by the Sockpuppet Deep State Fake News Media



A U.S. House committee investigating whether Russia has tried to influence U.S. public opinion on fossil fuels asked Facebook (FB.O), Twitter (TWTR.N) and Alphabet (GOOGL.O) on Wednesday to turn over information about Russian entities that may have bought anti-fracking advertisements. One of the thousands of political ads purchased by Russian groups during the 2016 election was a Black Lives Matter ad that targeted residents of Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland, CNN reported Wednesday. The ad, which reportedly ran on Facebook in late 2015 or early 2016, was designed to look as if it supported the Black Lives Matter movement. What?!


CNN Finally Discovers ‘Proof’ of Russia Connection πŸ˜‚ - The Latest Preposterous Russian Witch Hunt by the Sockpuppet Deep State Fake News Media

Related:

100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities

Who is Criticizing Black Lives Matter?

POLL: Americans Blame Deep State Shill Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook for Fake News



Related:

http://markzuckerberg2020.blogspot.com

Friday, September 22, 2017

Fake News Machine Dates Back Decades



Fake News Machine Dates Back Decades

CNN FACES POTENTIAL CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT OVER ‘FAKE NEWS’

Group plans class action lawsuit to take down CNN once and for all


Ohio-based attorney Joni Turner and others are planning to file a class action lawsuit against the discredited media giant CNN for “fake news, defamation, targeting, and bullying.”
In a video published to YouTube on Aug. 20, Turner said that such action has “never been done before” and will require four to five thousand people.
To make it work Turner plans on using “menacing” and “cyberbullying” laws to go after the so-called “bonafide news organization” in federal court and ultimately the Supreme Court.
As of September 6, 2017, over 25,000 people have already opted to join the “Takedown of Faketown,” which vows to “legally go after CNN… using every avenue available” in order to “hold them accountable.”
“You get into federal court by a couple of ways,” the attorney explained. “One of the most common ways is that the plaintiff that is suing is in a different state than the defendant and you are suing for more than $50,000. Okay, well we meet that threshold so we can get into federal court with this.”
According to Turner, the group plans on legally “calling out” CNN “for their destruction of not only the news but their destruction of the United States” entirely.
The outspoken attorney claims that CNN has attempted to target Americans by lumping them into “a recognized group.”
“We are a recognized group that are Americans,” she said. “If you’ve got a flag in your front yard you better watch out. Okay, if you’ve got a Trump hat on, or are wearing anything red, white and blue, you better watch out because CNN’s got them coming for us.”

Touching on the subject during her appearance on the Alex Jones Show Thursday, Turner told listeners, “Make no doubt about it, they are targeting a group. They have a group specific in mind and then they are funding the wolves that are going to come in. We have no freedom of speech anymore. I have people that are being shot at that have a Trump sticker.”
Turner also expressed great disdain for CNN anchor Don Lemon and liberal filmmaker Michael Moore, who Turner said essentially called Trump a “rapist” and Trump supporters “accomplices to rape” during a taped CNN segment three weeks ago.
Turner said that’s when she felt she needed to take action.
“This is huge. It’s not just a small case,” she said. “We have twenty-five-thousand, and those are singular people who have signed up… These people have given their full names, their addresses, and their phone numbers. These people aren’t messing around. They’re not putting on burkas or covering up their faces [they are like] here’s my phone number, here’s where we live and we are coming after you CNN.”
“It’s time that our legal system gets on the ball,” the attorney also stated.

Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist, analyst, and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified(2013). Shepard is a regular contributor to Infowars. Read more from Shep’s World. Follow Shep onFacebook and Twitter.

Thursday, September 14, 2017

Amazon deletes 1-star reviews of Hillary Clinton's book What Happened - Hillary Clinton Alternate Nostril Breathing Demonstration πŸ˜‚

Amazon has been monitoring and deleting reviews after Hillary Clinton's new book was greeted with a torrent of criticism on the day it was released.

What Happened, which covers the former Secretary of State's unsuccessful election campaign against Donald Trump, was published on Tuesday. Clinton and her publisher Simon & Schuster claimed the book would offer a candid account of her failure and her own reflection on it. 





jdedad 1 day ago
Www.Fakespot.com gives Amazon link to book F grade highly fake reviews





Related:

Hillary's Book Reduced Before Debut - 40% Off = Fake BestSeller - Hillary Clinton Attacks Alex Jones Again In New Book: Video Excerpts - Hillary Not Doing Well on New Book Tour πŸ˜‚ - Hillary Clinton Once Again Rants Moronically About Trump and Russia - “DON’T GIVE A F*CK” BOOK OUTSELLING HILLARY’S “WHAT HAPPENED”

AFTER TRUMP TWEETS, AMAZON MARKET VALUE DROPS $5 BILLION - Minimum Wage And Amazon Will Destroy the US Economy

Better Book!!!


“Money and Politics” - Peter Schweizer Author... by debunkerbuster

Amazon deletes 1-star reviews of Hillary Clinton's book What Happened - Hillary Clinton Alternate Nostril Breathing Demonstration πŸ˜‚

Monday, September 4, 2017

Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org Debunks the Russian Hacking Narrative - Corporate Media Brings Back Election "May" Have Been "Hacked", "Possibly" By Russia Narrative


Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org Debunks the... by debunkerbuster
Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org Debunks the... by debunkerbuster

Related:

100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities

Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org Debunks the Russian Hacking Narrative - Corporate Media Brings Back Election "May" Have Been "Hacked", "Possibly" By Russia Narrative

Killing Bigfoot Can Land You in Jail? Debunking the Fake News of Wochit Entertainment and National Geographic

Pompous reporters for Wochit Entertainment and National Geographic assert without a single citation to back up their statement that Bigfoot is a fictional creature. A single link is not too much to ask for a journalist making such a presumptuous statement. I will give you my choice for a link and challenge these fake news purveyors (debunking the lies of National Geographic is something I'm quite familiar with) to add one single source to back up their claim. Here is mine: http://undebunkingbigfoot.blogspot.com/2014/02/best-evidence-for-existence-of.html. Now please add one to your pages and we'll see which one, and the material it references, that people find most convincing, shall we?



In Skamania County, Washington, which considers itself a Bigfoot refuge a 1984 law states that killing the mythical ape-like creature can get you a year in jail, a $1,000 fine or both. Even though Bigfoot is fictional, the Animal Legal Defense Fund included it on their list of animals who people cannot harm without repercussion. The fund states that Bigfoot is on the list because it points to the larger commonalities” between people and other animals.” http://news.nationalgeographic.com/20... http://www.wochit.com

Even though Bigfoot is fictional (sorry, cryptozoologists), the defense fund included it on their list because “we feel [it] points to the larger commonalities” between people and other animals, Rosengard says. (Read about a Bigfoot sighting in Yellowstone.)


In other words, we and our wild kin are all sentient creatures that deserve legal protection.

Bigfoot cannot "point towards larger commonalities" between mankind and animals unless it is real if you ask me. This may very well be the belief of those that made the law who just didn't want to come right out and say it because of the ridicule factor that these two reports are ignorantly further propagating. This isn't just my opinion, but an educated guess based on the fact that other such laws have admittedly been implemented because of the view of those who drafted them that the evidence is compelling...

Oregon Legislative Assembly—1977 Regular Session House Joint Resolution 52 Sponsored by Representative (later Governor) Kulongoski (at the request of Anita Paulsen)

Notwithstanding that Sasquatch are reputed to live in Devil’s Club swamps and feed on poison oak, there are those who insist on searching for them. Although no one has positively identified or captured one, this Legislative Assembly feels that it is a matter of time before this event will occur.
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2012/07/protecting-sasquatch

In another piece of dishonest reporting at mentalfloss.com the author goes through some mental gymnastics to fit his bias when they write:

The first place to outlaw Bigfoot slaughter explicitly was Skamania County, Washington. In 1969, two years after the release of the controversial Patterson-Gimlin film, the county found itself caught in the heat of peak Bigfoot fever. Believers flooded the Pacific Northwest with plans to track down the stealthy beast—and, as the Board of County Commissioners soon noticed, many visitors brought dangerous hunting weapons with them. Not only did this pose a risk to potential Bigfoots, but it also threatened the residents living in these supposed Sasquatch hotspots. More concerned with the safety of the latter than the former, the commissioners passed an official ordinance [PDF] stating that slaying Bigfoot was a felony punishable by up to five years in prison.

What else besides bias can explain the Bizarro World-esque inversion of reality of claiming the commissioners were "more concerned with the safety of the latter than the former" when the document itself clearly puts the former (the compelling evidence for Bigfoot) front and center before mentioning the weapons. The document does not support the assertion that the existence of the creature was not a real concern and simply added to the document as a means to an end. To the contrary, the order in which the concerns are laid out and more importantly the wording chosen, starting right off the bat with "evidence continues to accumulate indicating the possible existence... of a ape-like nocturnal primate." Noting an influx of scientific investigators before mentioning "believers" or casual hunters, and declaring the Sasquatch an endangered species, is another indication that the lawmakers were being fair and lending the credence to the subject that they thought it deserved.



More:

http://www.skamaniacounty.org/ordinance/Ord_1984-2.pdf

In 1991 a nearby area in Washington, Whatcom County, drafted very similar legislation, which again started out by citing evidence before getting into concerns about weapons. This time much more emphasis was put on the evidence making it even clearer that the law makers did indeed find the evidence persuasive...

Undiscovered Species Protection Act

Whereas, there is evidence to indicate the possible existence of an undiscovered species a primate mammal variously described as Bigfoot, Sasquatch, an ape-like creature or a subspecies of Homo Sapiens. Whereas, reported recent and past sightings, research by anthropologist, Primatologist, biologist, forensic experts, cryptozooligst, independent organizations, private individuals and the famous chimpanzee researcher Jane Goodall support this possibility.

I added the links in the above paragraph with info to back-up what is being stated.

Source: Big Government. Small Brains. Dumb Laws. http://www.dumblaws.com/law/1917

As I've noted in the past these self-proclaimed Bigfoot debunkers are better off pretending (as they seemingly often do) that such individuals don't exist!

Serious researchers will be aware that such laws are not very surprising given the fact that so many front line legal experts, otherwise known as police officers, have reportedly had encounters with these so-called fictional beasts.



As an anonymous hunter sums it up:

I'm sorry but every single hunter, police officer, and other professions dedicated to observing details and analytical indetification throughout the last 250 years aren't misidentifying bears as something unknown. Does misidetifiation occur? Yes but not at the rate the debunkers claim. Regardless if the actual truth occurs at only the most minimal rate, there is still a certain degree of something unknown existing. I've personally taken dozens of specimens of dozens of species of wildlife in the past 25 years of hunting across several states. Granted, I've never experienced an unknown creature, never have I witnessed a bear in any situation where it could be misidentified as a naturally bipedal, shaggy haired, 8 foot tall, hominin. For me to lay the assertion out the people much more trained and experienced than I am, in somewhere I've never been, at a high rate are misidentifying bear as an ape man is way too much. Not everyone thinks in darker ways either. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2013/07/listen-to-last-nights-coast-to-coast-am.html?showComment=1373608459192#c7776496416280399501 

Those who when it comes to this subject or other taboo topics are dismissive out of hand, insulting, condescending, who mock and sneer, etc., are usually misinformed/ignorant pseudo-skeptics. Even if they are right about the existence of Sasquatch, they are still engaging in horrendous journalism. They are many times nearly clueless about the extent and quality of the existing evidence, the minutia, the DNA studies, the peer-reviewed papers. If they are right, it is only because the happen to be. It isn't because they did their due-diligence and came to a conclusion. If they are wrong, we who simply say the evidence is compelling and worthy of study, will laugh in their face if they are ever proven so. I wonder how many of them choose to engage the subject in the manner that they do (not that they don't think it's real but the way they go about letting you know) because they are not very nice people. The type that must ridicule, humiliate or demean others to inflate their own egos. 

CNN Reporter Didn’t Expect This After Attacking Trump’s Texas Speech

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/search?q=jim+acosta
TrumpArea.com
https://pjmedia.com/spengler/2017/08/03/jim-acosta-racist-apologist-for-white-privilege/

americanpatriotdaily.com

CNN has a major problem on their hands.

They thought that being a mouthpiece for the left-wing establishment in their news coverage would be a good move.
But after one CNN reporter waged a disgusting attack on President Trump, he was quickly reminded that the American people still support the President.
In the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, most Americans were happy to see President Trump ready to lend support.
But CNN reporter Jim Acosta was more interested in finding reasons to attack the President.
On the day of Trump’s speech in Texas, Acosta shared a video attacking the President for his speech.


In the tweet he stated:
“Serious question: Does POTUS always have to care about his crowd size?”
In response, Trump supporters took on Acosta for his ridiculous attack.

Serious question: Does POTUS always have to care about his crowd size? https://twitter.com/vicenews/status/902623566411194368 
People are dead. Cities under water and this is your focus? Dude...get a big mirror and analyze!


Serious question: Does POTUS always have to care about his crowd size? https://twitter.com/vicenews/status/902623566411194368 
Well..THIS coming from the same media focusing on Melania's shoes !


Serious question: Does POTUS always have to care about his crowd size? https://twitter.com/vicenews/status/902623566411194368 
Why don't you give up and start reporting something worthwhile? Do you realize how ridiculous you're making yourself look?


Serious question: Does POTUS always have to care about his crowd size? https://twitter.com/vicenews/status/902623566411194368 
you just keep driving that nail in CNN'so coffin


Serious question: Does POTUS always have to care about his crowd size? https://twitter.com/vicenews/status/902623566411194368 
Serious question: Does Jim Acosta ever think anyone gives 2 πŸ’© about his opinion.  = 


Serious question: Does POTUS always have to care about his crowd size? https://twitter.com/vicenews/status/902623566411194368 
Serious question, do you really consider yourself a  ? You and @cnn are the laughing stock of US and will B the reason we keep WH

It is clear that most Americans are more worried about those who need rescue than they are of President Trump remarking on his crowd size at a speech.
But to the left-wing media, attacking President Trump is more important than anything else.
And Jim Acosta is no stranger to criticizing the President.
He has made a name for himself for rudely interrupting and shouting at the President during White House press conferences.
Trump has consistently fired back at Acosta, famously calling him and CNN “fake news” on multiple occasions.
Since the election of Donald Trump, many believe CNN has lost every bit of credibility it once had.
CNN has become synonymous with the term “fake news” in households across the country.
Do you think CNN is fake news?
Related:



O'Keefe Frames #FakeNews WaPo's RETRACTION - CNN Producer Doubles Down on "Stupid as Sh*t" Comments About Voters:

http://fakenewsinvasion.blogspot.com/2017/07/okeefe-frames-fakenews-wapos-retraction.html


CNN Threatens Reddit User For Exercising Free Speech | #CNNBlackmail - #FakeNewsCNN Threatens To Dox a Private Citizen Over Trump Wrestling Meme #CNNBlackmail #CNNDoxxing:


http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/fakenewscnn-threatens-to-dox-private.html

O'Keefe's 3rd Film Exposes CNN's Internal Culture Of Hate And The Actual Creation of Fake News - CNN Producer: Voters "Stupid as Sh*t"– American Pravda: CNN Part 3:


http://fakenewsinvasion.blogspot.com/2017/06/okeefes-3rd-film-exposes-cnns-internal.html 

Project Veritas Exposes Van Jones says Russia is a Big Nothing Burger - FLASHBACK Jun 11, 2017 Chris Wallace: Russia scandal is not a "nothing burger" - Van Jones Debunks Chris Wallace LOL!:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/06/project-veritas-exposes-van-jones-says.html

Secret Recording: CNN Producer Bonifield on Russia/Trump: 'President Probably Right to Say You Are Witch-Hunting Me' 'No Smoking Gun' 'No Real Proof' 'Trump Good for Business':

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/06/secret-recording-cnn-producer-bonifield.html