Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Secret Recording: CNN Producer Bonifield on Russia/Trump: 'President Probably Right to Say You Are Witch-Hunting Me' 'No Smoking Gun' 'No Real Proof' 'Trump Good for Business'



CNN Producer Admits Trump/Russia is Bullsh!t Witch Hunt - TRUMP MUST NOW REVOKE CNN’S WHITE HOUSE PRESS CREDENTIALS O'Keefe tape exposes network as anti-Trump activist organization: 

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/06/cnn-producer-admits-trumprussia-is.html

CNN Producer Admits Trump/Russia is Bullsh!t Witch Hunt - TRUMP MUST NOW REVOKE CNN’S WHITE HOUSE PRESS CREDENTIALS O'Keefe tape exposes network as anti-Trump activist organization



TRUMP MUST NOW REVOKE CNN’S WHITE HOUSE PRESS CREDENTIALS

O'Keefe tape exposes network as anti-Trump activist organization


President Donald Trump must now consider revoking CNN’s White House press credentials after a new video released by Project Veritas revealed that the network pushes Trump-Russia hysteria despite knowing the whole story is “mostly bullshit”.
CNN senior producer John Bonifield was asked about the network’s breathless coverage of the Russia investigation and allegations that Trump colluded with Moscow to influence the election.
“Could be bullshit,” Bonifield responded. “I mean, it’s mostly bullshit right now.”
In other words, a senior producer at CNN was caught on tape admitting that the network deliberately pushes fake news about Donald Trump.
“I think the president is probably right to say, like, look you are witch hunting me. You have no smoking gun. You have no real proof,” Bonifield went on to say.
He then admitted that CNN pushes the fake news Trump-Russia collusion story to get viewers.
Asked, “Why is CNN constantly like Russia this, Russia that?,” Bonifield responds, “Because it’s ratings. … Our ratings are incredible right now.”
Three CNN journalists were also just forced to resign after the network apologized for pushing another fake news story about Trump advisor Anthony Scaramucci being linked to a Russian investment fund.
Any other news outlet that admitted it created fake news simply to make money and attract eyeballs would be savaged by the rest of the media, put on a blacklist and wouldn’t get anywhere near the White House.
Why should CNN, an organization that employs activists posing as impartial reporters like Jim Acosta, be treated any differently?
Trump must now seriously look at revoking CNN’s access to the White House.
Fake news is dangerous to democracy. Fake news should not be tolerated.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: 
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.comand Prison Planet.com.

CNN EXPOSED IN UNDERCOVER STING! Producer Says Trump - Russia Story Fake News! - Hannity: CNN's credibility crisis starts with Jeff Zucker - The real colluders are the ones who claim collusion

Very, Very, Fake News Owner Jeff Zucker Is Taking Over Trump Fake Story Investigation - CNN Producer John Bonifield admits CNN is Very Fake News - BREAKING: CNN CAUGHT!! LEAKED TAPES PROVE HORRIFIC TRUTH TRUMP WARNED AMERICA ABOUT! THEY’RE DONE!

CNN Embroiled In Fake News Scandal, And Water Is Wet - James O'Keefe Just Let CNN Fake News Wipe Itself Out !, American Pravda: CNN Producer Says Russia Narrative “bullsh*t"




Friday, June 23, 2017

Who is David Brock? Media Matters For America is Operation Mockingbird #freedomofjoycehshow - David Brock Is The Brain Of The Fake News Media

Freedom of Joyce Show explores David Brock who has been described by Time as "one of the most influential operatives in the Democratic Party." He is the ex-boyfriend of James Alefontis, and founder of Media Matters for America. Brock's Media Matters is “engaged with Facebook behind the scenes” to shape the social network's fight against "fake news." Ian Jacklin from icurecancer.com joins in hour 2. Topics discussed include: cannabis, super soldiers, and the Anunnaki.
Petition calling for the investigation of David Brock by the Department of Justice. https://www.change.org/p/united-state...




Media and Propaganda

The mainstream media has played a central role in promoting and maintaining the 9/11 Myth. Following the attack, the large media outlets dutifully described the events of that day within the confines of the official story, avoiding facts, questions, and entire topics that point to official complicity.
Rather than asking difficult questions, the corporate media has been quick to attack and dismiss serious challenges to the official story.

Language as Propaganda

Language plays a crucial role, not only in attacking these challenges through the use of pejorative labels such as conspiracy theories, but through the shaping of the way people perceive the central events of the attack itself -- such as the total destruction of the Twin Towers. Those events were labeled collapses by the media -- language adopted even by most researchers proposing that explosives brought down the Towers. Yet the definition of "collapse" clashes with the explosive reality of those events documented by the numerous photographs, videos, and eyewitness accounts.
e x c e r p t
title: The Semantics of Deception
authors: C. Thurston
According to Merriam-Webster, "collapse" means "to cave or fall in or give way <the bridge collapsed>". The leading hypothesis coming from bona fide scientific analysis is that the Towers DIDN'T cave in or give way, they were systematically and progressively EXPLODED from the top down, starting from the impact zone in each Tower.
If one compares the meaning of the words "collapse" and "explosion" outside of the confusing context of the destruction of the Towers, it becomes clear that they are, in fact, opposites. A collapse "pulls things down", whereas an explosion "blows things up". A true collapse, by its nature, once triggered, is a self-fulfilling event that needs only the help of gravity to reach its completion.
The description of the Towers' destruction as "collapses" was cemented within hours and days of the attack.
s u m m a r y
title: Helpful Hints for Understanding What Happened on 9/11
Helpful Hints for Understanding What Happened on 9/11: Perception, Suggestion and Reality in the Destruction of the World Trade Center 
N. J. Burkett, an ABC News correspondent, was standing more than a block away from the WTC Towers on 9/11 when the South Tower destruction begins. He interrupts his live TV commentary by shouting as everyone runs for cover: "...A HUGE EXPLOSION NOW - RAINING DEBRIS ON ALL OF US! WE"D BETTER GET OUT OF THE WAY!" This was typical of the early reporting, but by the afternoon all of the major media had removed the word "explosion" from their dictionaries. From this point on, the Towers had "collapsed". This shift in language and its repetition by a parade of media "experts" contributed to the widespread perception, not of what people had seen, but of what they were TOLD they had seen.

The belief that the airplanes caused the destruction of the Towers was central to the success of 9/11 as a false flag attack. 9/11 can be seen within the context of the long and continuing history of false flag provocations and the wars of aggression that inevitably follow in their wake. Entire populations are dragged along through pain and suffering as the confused and unwitting victims of this ancient and terrible practice.

Operation Mockingbird

A historical example of the shaping of media messages to achieve covert aims is Operation Mockingbird, a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operation to influence domestic and foreign media. In this operation the CIA recruited journalists for the dual purpose of gathering information and disseminating propaganda. Wikipedia gives this overview of the operation's history:
e x c e r p t
title: Operation Mockingbird
In 1948, Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects (OSP). Soon afterwards OSP was renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC). This became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the Central Intelligence Agency. Wisner was told to create an organization that concentrated on "propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements ini threatened countries of the free world." 1 

Later that year Wisner established Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic and foreign media. Wisner recruited Philip Graham (Washington Post) to run the project within the industry. According to Deborah Davis ("Katharine the Great"): "By the early 1950s, Wisner 'owned' respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles." 2 

...

In 1977, Rolling Stone alleged that one of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists alleged by Rolling Stone Magazine to have been willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (The Miami News'), Herb Gold (The Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). 3   According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman), these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work. 4  

References

1. 
Invisible Government, 1964
2. Katharine the Great, 1979
3. CIA and the Media, Rolling Stone Magazine, 10/20/1977
4. A Very Private Woman, 1998 


Source: http://911review.com/disinfo/media.html

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Faith Goldy: If Fake News Treated All Terror Alike

In a satirical piece, The Rebel's Faith Goldy adopts traditional media and political lines used following an Islamist attack in covering the Finsbury Mosque attack to underscore the bizarre and backwards logic the West is used to following an episode of Islamic terrorism.

Sunday, June 18, 2017

False Tweet Sends Media Into Overdrive on Warriors' Boycott of Trump White House

By Jay Maxson | June 13, 2017 6:15 PM EDT

Today will not go into the annals of "Great Days in Journalism History." It's a day of shame for much of the left-stream media, which proved that a lie travels halfway around the world before the truth puts on its boots.
The day started with Josh Brown, a commentator on CNBC, spinning a big fib in a Tweet to his 721,000 followers about how the newly crowned NBA champion Golden State Warriors had unanimously decided to boycott the Trump White House, "per reports."
That razor-thin snippet was all the verification left-stream writers needed to justify stories they hoped would embarrass President Trump. Media frenzy ensued and reporters from the West Coast to London repeated Brown's claim, per reports. Within a matter of hours, the search term "Warriors to boycott White House" had accumulated 652,000 internet entries!
Among those who ran free and wild with this dubious "news" are: the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s JuliaKate Culpepper, The Root's Stephen Cockrell, Jen Hayden of The Daily Kos, Patrick May of The Mercury News, The Sporting News, The Daily Mail, the Washington Post, Ryan Bort of Newsweek, NBC Sports, the Kansas City Star, Madeline Kenney of the Chicago Sun-Times, BET and many more.
News One's Angela Bronner Helm deserves special mention for her ingenuity. From Brown's Tweet, she extrapolated the story as "the Kaepernick Effect."
Since Colin Kaepernick, former quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers took a stand during the 2015 NFL season, many athletes are being more vocal in their political opinions. And the same is true of the Golden State Warriors, who, according to various reports, are not coming to Donald Trump‘s White House, as is customary for teams after winning the NBA title.
The New York Daily News came out swinging as hard as anyone with: "Rejected! The Golden State Warriors are reportedly not sticking to sports. According to CNBC's Josh Brown, the NBA champs have unanimously declined an invitation to President Donald Trump's White House, which should come as no surprise to those who have followed the left-leaning franchise the last few months."
The charade also drew in Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, whose Tweet invited the champs to visit the U.S. capitol.
Eventually the Golden State Warriors issued a news release refuting Brown, stating the president had not yet issued an invitation to the team to visit the White House.
By early afternoon, Forbes' Jerry Barca had dug around and posted a story about how Jason McIntyre of The Big Lead had pressed Brown to fess up: "I have no idea if it's true, hence 'per reports.'"
Barca wrote: "Turns out, Brown posted the boycott news based on a tweet from an unverified Twitter account of Mike Sington, whose bio on the social media platform describes him as a retired director of operations at Universal Studios and the world's top celebrity expert":
Several media posted updates correcting the falsehood. As of this post, some had not done so yet.
The gem of the day came from a blog called, ironicallyA Shred of Truth, which reported the Warriors "unanimously decided not to accept congratulations from President Donald Trump." This was the smallest shred of truth in history!

This day of hysteria oddly enough followed Monday's visit to the Trump White House by the Clemson University national championship football team. With deference to Dickens: in a tale of two champions, it was the most political and the least political of times. While media recklessly rushed headlong into falsehood in hopes of politicizing the Warriors, The Bleacher Report and The Sporting News were among many media that played the Clemson celebration straight down the line without malice to the Republican president. The egg-dripping lib media badly needed this positive to salve its already tarnished reputation for reporting fake news.
Related:

DEAR Stephen Curry: Donald Trump Is Not An Ass... YOU ARE!

Editor's Note:

"Are we promoting change? Are we doing things that are going to look out for everybody?" Curry said. "And not being so self-serving that it's only about making money, selling shoes, doing this and that. That's not the priority. It's about changing lives. I think we can continue to do that." 


Trump's economic policies do indeed look out for everybody, Stephen.

Unlike your economic policy of selling shoes for $140!!!

DEAR Stephen Curry: Donald Trump Is Not An Ass... YOU ARE!

Stephen Curry has made headlines by calling President Donald Trump an ass rather than an asset to the United States Economy with regards to Business. He is also questioning the morals of Under Armour, the company he is endorsed by. Under Armour’s CEO Kevin Plank has praised Donald Trump as being an asset to the United States. Curry is under contract with Under Armour until 2024. However, Curry plays for the Golden State Warriors in the city of Oakland California. What is his opinions on the crime in Oakland California? The city of Oakland is in a tumultuous state under democratic rule. Are the politicians who and the centers of Oakland California an ass? Stephen Curry is the real ass for being disingenuous. He has no problem with supporting the democratic left and their agenda to destroy the black communities.

Chris Wallace desperately tries to push fake news, Trump Lawyer Sekulow won't have it. - Hillary, Lynch and Comey can so easily be prosecuted for Obstruction of Justice. SLAM DUNK EVIDENCE - TRUMP ATTORNEY: THE PRESIDENT IS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION



TRUMP ATTORNEY: THE PRESIDENT IS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION

'The president is not and has not been under investigation for obstruction'


An attorney for President Trump was adamant on Sunday that the president is not under investigation, despite the president’s tweets this week referring to one as a “witch hunt.”
“Let me be clear here,” said Jay Sekulow, a member of the president’s legal team, on NBC’s “Meet The Press.” “The president is not and has not been under investigation for obstruction.”

On Friday morning, President Trump sent a tweet that seemed to confirm that he was under scrutiny, writing, “I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt.”
But Sekulow claimed the president wasn’t referring to an actual investigation in the message, but instead a news report about one.

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Laura Loomer Refuses to Go on ‘Very #FakeNews’ CNN After Parent Co Funds Trump Assas Play - Huge Boycott At CNN Fake News Headquarters - Fake News Is a ‘Threat to Our Democracy’

Alex Jones & Meygn Kelly - Truth V. Fake News



Media superstar and colossus Alex Jones has “nuclear scooped” Megyn Kelly and released a secret recording from their controversial interview in which the NBC soon-to-be-released-star promises him she is not preparing a “gotcha hit piece.” Yes, it seems Megyn Kelly defended her interview with Jones as an attempt to "shine a light" on him and his relationship to the White House. In a statement on Tuesday, Kelly, the NBC News host who feuded with President Trump during the 2016 election, responded to her critics, which included organizers of a Sandy Hook memorial event that she was disinvited from attending. We talk Megyn and why she just never connected.






Sorry, I always question whether people's indignation is healthy when others question if people actually died in an event. Seeing as how our government actually put these phrases in a document... "Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." "Conduct funerals for mock-victims" https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Northwoods.html


Alex Jones Final Statement on Sandy Hook by debunkerbuster

Tribute to Megyn Kelly by debunkerbuster

Thursday, June 8, 2017

James Comey Admits: Trump Admin Didn’t Obstruct Investigation, Trump Never Under Investigation, He Leaked Info to Media About Trump, Clinton and Loretta Lynch Obstructed Justice & New York Times Story Was Fake

Sierra Pearl6 hours ago

So basically this event proves a few things;

1. Trump has not committed a crime.

2. There is still no evidences of Russia collusion. There is only leaks, innuendos, speculations, assumptions, and hersay.

3. Trump did not ask Comey to stop the investigation.

4. Trump never pressured anyone to stop the investigation and anything else.
5. Comey is a liar who can't see that he just contradicted himself with that memo claim.
6. Clinton and Lynch committed Obstruction of Justice. 

7. Trump did not commit Obstruction of Justice.





#FAKENEWS! Senate Hearing Finds NY Times Prints Fake News


CNN Admits Fake News About Comey Testimony - Issues Retraction - James Comey Incriminates Himself - Not Trump

Monday, May 29, 2017

FAKE NEWS

COMEY LIED: FBI JUST LEAKED JAMES COMEY’S DIRTY LAUNDRY AND IT’S SICK - Bombshell: Comey Admits He Lied To Congress


Danny Gold for Liberty Writers reports, James Comey lied to the American people while under oath and now Barack Obama’s spying and unmasking scheme is center stage again. Today a declassified FBI document was handed over to CIRCA that proves FBI agents have NOT been following the laws put in place to protect American privacy.


Sources: Comey acted on Russian intelligence he knew was fake:
Washington (CNN)Then-FBI Director James Comey knew that a critical piece of information relating to the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email was fake -- created by Russian intelligence -- but he feared that if it became public it would undermine the probe and the Justice Department itself, according to multiple officials with knowledge of the process... 
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that this Russian intelligence was unreliable. US officials now tell CNN that Comey and FBI officials actually knew early on that this intelligence was indeed false. 
In fact, acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe went to Capitol Hill Thursday to push back on the notion that the FBI was duped, according to a source familiar with a meeting McCabe had with members of the Senate intelligence committee. 
The Russian intelligence at issue purported to show that then-Attorney General Lynch had been compromised in the Clinton investigation. The intelligence described emails between then-Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and a political operative suggesting that Lynch would make the FBI investigation of Clinton go away.In classified sessions with members of Congress several months ago, Comey described those emails in the Russian claim and expressed his concern that this Russian information could "drop" and that would undermine the Clinton investigation and the Justice Department in general, according to one government official. 
Still, Comey did not let on to lawmakers that there were doubts about the veracity of the intelligence, according to sources familiar with the briefings. It is unclear why Comey was not more forthcoming in a classified setting. 
Sources close to Comey tell CNN he felt that it didn't matter if the information was accurate, because his big fear was that if the Russians released the information publicly, there would be no way for law enforcement and intelligence officials to discredit it without burning intelligence sources and methods. There were other factors behind Comey's decision, sources say. 
In at least one classified session, Comey cited that intelligence as the primary reason he took the unusual step of publicly announcing the end of the Clinton email probe. 
In that briefing, Comey did not even mention the other reason he gave in public testimony for acting independently of the Justice Department -- that Lynch was compromised because Bill Clinton boarded her plane and spoke to her during the investigation, these sources told CNN...
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/26/politics/james-comey-fbi-investigation-fake-russian-intelligence/index.html

So Comey ended the email investigation because of fake Russian intelligence, that he failed to disclose was fake, and that never went public for the fear it would go public? Why would the Russians need to release such false intelligence? Politics is perception. The perception that then-Attorney General Lynch had been compromised in the Clinton investigation was already there from her meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac, which Comey used as a public excuse. This all makes no logical sense. It could be, within the context of this unverifiable story, that Comey is lying now, which makes him out to be a liar then, when he wasn't actually lying then in his public statements. 

CNN: The Clown News Network

CNN is a joke. Literally. Conan O'Brien, Joel McHale, Larry Wilmore, and even Barack Obama tell the truth about CNN in comedy. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.


20 CNN Fake News Compilation! (PROOF) by debunkerbuster
CNN's greatest "Fake news" Compilation... by debunkerbuster