Saturday, December 30, 2017
Fusion GPS Founder's Wife Admits Husband Behind Fake Russiagate Story
Fusion GPS Founder's Wife Admits Husband Behind Fake Russiagate Story
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
Thursday, December 28, 2017
Facebook Learns the Hard Way, Rolls Back "Fake News" Countermeasures
Facebook Learns the Hard Way, Rolls Back "Fake News" Countermeasures
New York Times Says Best Stock Market Ever Is The Worst
New York Times Says Best Stock Market Ever Is The Worst
Monday, December 25, 2017
Sunday, December 24, 2017
Trump's alleged comments on Haitians and Nigerians - "They All Have AIDS" is a Nonsense Legacy Media Attack Line on Trump
Trump's alleged comments on Haitians and Nigerians - "They All Have AIDS" is a Nonsense Legacy Media Attack Line on Trump
Related:
Donald Trump a Racist?
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2016/03/donald-trump-racist.html
Crowder's 16-Hour CNN Torture Livestream! | Louder With Crowder
Crowder's 16-Hour CNN Torture Livestream! | Louder With Crowder
Related:
http://fakenewsinvasion.blogspot.com/search?q=cnn
Tuesday, December 19, 2017
The Washington Post Caught Lying & Did Mueller Illegally Obtain Trump's Emails? - Trump Says Washington Post Story That He Almost Withdrew Neil Gorsuch Nomination is 'FAKE NEWS'
Related:
http://fakenewsinvasion.blogspot.com/search?q=Washington+Post
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
Thursday, December 14, 2017
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
WINNING: TRUMP DEMANDS WASHINGTON POST APOLOGIZE OVER FAKE PHOTO – THEY ACTUALLY DO - Washington Post Gets Lit Up by The Donald After Spreading Fake News Story
 |
| TrumpArea.com |
If there’s anything that Donald Trump likes more than being president, being rich and being able to melt liberal snowflakes everywhere, it’s going after the “fake news media.” And the great thing is, they make it so easy. Take The Washington Post, the place where democracy (and factual reportage) has been dying in darkness ever since Janet Cooke was “covering” prepubescent heroin addicts in the early 1980s. They haven’t printed anything quite that fake in recent years, but darned if they haven’t been trying to at least approach Ms. Cooke’s lofty standard of hoaxery. One of those strivers is Dave Weigel, a WaPo reporter who decided to tweet about President Trump’s rally in Pensacola, Florida, on Friday. Given Weigel’s employer, I’m going to guess he doesn’t exactly have a monthly rail pass on the Trump train. On his private Twitter account, Mr. Weigel took a shot at the president, as WaPo reporters are wont to do: There are two things one notices here: 1) Dave Weigel’s ridiculous Twitter avatar makes him look like one of the lesser members of the fictional band Stillwater from Cameron Crowe’s “Almost Famous” and 2) this looks like the crowd from an XFL game. The second point would have been a devastating prospect for Trump. After all, he’s known for his loyal fan base, and if his crowds are being reduced to Jeb Bush-sized affairs, that’s not a good thing. There’s one slightly teeny little problem here, however: The picture, according to Trump, was taken hours before he arrived at the venue. And, as you can see from the photographic evidence the president provided, one tends to believe the commander in chief: Trump said that Weigel “put out a phony photo of an empty arena hours before I arrived @ the venue, w/ thousands of people outside, on their way in. Real photos now shown as I spoke. Packed house, many people unable to get in. Demand apology & retraction from FAKE NEWS WaPo!” Weigel actually did apologize because … well, what was the alternative? He’d already been called out by the president and the U.K. Daily Mail’s U.S. politics editor David Martosko, according to The Hill, which led to the photo’s deletion. Nevertheless, Trump decided apologies weren’t quite going to cut it. Weigel can apologize all he wants, but this is a serious issue. I don’t wish unemployment on Dave Weigel, but let’s put it this way: Were this me and had I done this, I’d be working on my resumé. Either way, he deserved the savage burn he (and his employer) got from President Trump.
WaPo Writer Apologizes To President Trump For Posting 'Phony Photo Of Empty Arena'
Trump Pensacola Florida crowd size. Just say no to fake news!
http://fakenewsinvasion.blogspot.com
WINNING: TRUMP DEMANDS WASHINGTON POST APOLOGIZE OVER FAKE PHOTO – THEY ACTUALLY DO - Washington Post Gets Lit Up by The Donald After Spreading Fake News Story
Monday, December 11, 2017
RUSH: Never Once Was There FAKE NEWS About Obama During His 8 Years
RUSH: Never Once Was There FAKE NEWS About Obama During His 8 Years
The Corporate Media's New Tactic To Retract Fake News Well After It Goes Viral
The Corporate Media's New Tactic To Retract Fake News Well After It Goes Viral
Sunday, December 10, 2017
Rush Limbaugh Enjoys Watching CNN 'Dig Their Own Graves' With 'SHAM' Russia Collusion Story - Another Fake News Fail By CNN - The People at CNN Defamed Donald Trump Jr re Wikileaks and Were Forced to Apologize
Rush Limbaugh Enjoys Watching CNN 'Dig Their Own Graves' With 'SHAM' Russia Collusion Story - Another Fake News Fail By CNN - The People at CNN Defamed Donald Trump Jr re Wikileaks and Were Forced to Apologize
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
Saturday, December 2, 2017
Friday, November 17, 2017
Fake News Desperately Trying To Cover Up Clinton Crimes - School nixes student's 'fake news' shirt on CNN field trip
Fake News Desperately Trying To Cover Up Clinton Crimes - School nixes student's 'fake news' shirt on CNN field trip
Thursday, November 16, 2017
Trump Drinks Water. Who Owns the Fake News Media and What Are Their Motives?
Trump Drinks Water. Who Owns the Fake News Media and What Are Their Motives? - Trump Drinks Liberal Tears 😂
Monday, November 13, 2017
"Fake News" Makes the Collins Dictionary Word of the Year - A Reaction
The term "Fake News" is the Collins Dictionary Word of the Year for 2017.
Mainstream media, in covering this story, reported that Donald Trump wrongly used the term against their organisations, that "Fake News" applies primarily to 'dubious' online sources, and that Trump is using it to deflect against criticism of his Presidency. However, Trump is, more often than not, correct in his usage against the mainstream press. The corporate media, as pointed out via a myriad of online sources, has a long history of being dishonest. It's not the online media that is the king of Fake News, it's the mainstream media.
It's important to note it is not simply a matter of taking the word of the alternative press at face value when it comes to their reporting - the leading online media outlets DIRECTLY SHOW the audience the nature of the mainstream lies so there can be no question.
If one considers the dictionary's definition of the term: ‘fake news’ that means “false, often sensational, information disseminated under the guise of news reporting” one can easily see how the definition DOES fit the mainstream press.
The term was first used at the end of the 2016 Presidential campaign to smear and essentially ring fence alterative media reporting that had been highlighting the bias and untruths the mainstream media used in helping Hillary Clinton throughout the election process.
The issue we face is that the mainstream media, on matters of war and high level cronyism, is a type of controlled opposition. They frame the debate and consequently your thoughts, concerning selected issues, and are especially active in this regard when it comes to Presidential campaigns. They protect the upper levels of a corrupted system (ie the owners and controllers of wealth and power in the USA).
The various terms used to describe the mainstream press help one understand how and why they operate (as censorship and debate controlling tools) and for whom. This media is know as the corporate press (the are owned and have loyalty to their sponsors), the establishment media (influenced by high level political bodies/lobbyists), the Mockingbird Media (where we have a record of strong media ties and interactions with the intelligence community), and where journalists and editors are often referred to as "presstitutes".
The tentacles of the controlled press also extend into the online alternative media via compromised individuals (moles/ideologues) and via money (sponsorship). This invites varying levels of (including self) censorship, that omits important information, includes outright lying and/or distortions - all of which changes the public perception (just as the mainstream does, although under the veneer of a more critical eye when it comes to certain pet issues that go beyond what the corporate press covers).
As a whole the controlled media creates a false sense of reality. They set the parameters when it comes to public discourse, steering the majority of people away from taboo topics that would expose a highly corrupted establishment.
Because of decades acting as the perceived information authority figure, the trusted mainstream media has this psychological advantage that they can use to hoodwink the public and push whatever spin they desire knowing that the vast majority of the population has neither the time and interest to independently check what they say. They can air stories that omit other views, run with incomplete facts, or push lies from unreliable sources, and people will assume they've done due diligence on the story.
The danger from the alternative media is that it can directly connect with the public and challenge the monopoly held by the mainstream press. They expose the deceptions and undermine their ability to control people's thoughts. This is why an attempt was made to smear the alternative press as "Fake News". The powers that be failed because reality bit them in the arse/ass. When they used the term "Fake News" they overstepped their ability to project propaganda.
For propaganda to work people have to sense that what is being pushed is true. In the case of the US Presidential election many people didn't buy what was being sold. They knew for a fact that the US economy was doing poorly, which was what Trump was telling them, and so their gambit - that things were already great - failed. In the 21st Century, facts on the ground still matter. Furthermore, people ARE turning online to discover things for themselves. Everything is online. People are directly connected via their smart phones. This is the new reality. People don't even have to go searching when it comes to gaining insights on politically charged issues either, especially as social media puts contradictory information right in their laps.
The alternative media in the online age has made a mockery of mainstream media's biased narrative, showing up their ties to corporate and military-industrial interests. It is no wonder that their smear of "Fake News" was easily turned against them.
Spook
Related:
The Truth About Fake News - PJW
Alternative to What? The BFP Roundtable Dissects the "Alternative" Media
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 10th, 2017.]
Mainstream media, in covering this story, reported that Donald Trump wrongly used the term against their organisations, that "Fake News" applies primarily to 'dubious' online sources, and that Trump is using it to deflect against criticism of his Presidency. However, Trump is, more often than not, correct in his usage against the mainstream press. The corporate media, as pointed out via a myriad of online sources, has a long history of being dishonest. It's not the online media that is the king of Fake News, it's the mainstream media.
It's important to note it is not simply a matter of taking the word of the alternative press at face value when it comes to their reporting - the leading online media outlets DIRECTLY SHOW the audience the nature of the mainstream lies so there can be no question.
If one considers the dictionary's definition of the term: ‘fake news’ that means “false, often sensational, information disseminated under the guise of news reporting” one can easily see how the definition DOES fit the mainstream press.
The term was first used at the end of the 2016 Presidential campaign to smear and essentially ring fence alterative media reporting that had been highlighting the bias and untruths the mainstream media used in helping Hillary Clinton throughout the election process.
The issue we face is that the mainstream media, on matters of war and high level cronyism, is a type of controlled opposition. They frame the debate and consequently your thoughts, concerning selected issues, and are especially active in this regard when it comes to Presidential campaigns. They protect the upper levels of a corrupted system (ie the owners and controllers of wealth and power in the USA).
The various terms used to describe the mainstream press help one understand how and why they operate (as censorship and debate controlling tools) and for whom. This media is know as the corporate press (the are owned and have loyalty to their sponsors), the establishment media (influenced by high level political bodies/lobbyists), the Mockingbird Media (where we have a record of strong media ties and interactions with the intelligence community), and where journalists and editors are often referred to as "presstitutes".
The tentacles of the controlled press also extend into the online alternative media via compromised individuals (moles/ideologues) and via money (sponsorship). This invites varying levels of (including self) censorship, that omits important information, includes outright lying and/or distortions - all of which changes the public perception (just as the mainstream does, although under the veneer of a more critical eye when it comes to certain pet issues that go beyond what the corporate press covers).
As a whole the controlled media creates a false sense of reality. They set the parameters when it comes to public discourse, steering the majority of people away from taboo topics that would expose a highly corrupted establishment.
Because of decades acting as the perceived information authority figure, the trusted mainstream media has this psychological advantage that they can use to hoodwink the public and push whatever spin they desire knowing that the vast majority of the population has neither the time and interest to independently check what they say. They can air stories that omit other views, run with incomplete facts, or push lies from unreliable sources, and people will assume they've done due diligence on the story.
The danger from the alternative media is that it can directly connect with the public and challenge the monopoly held by the mainstream press. They expose the deceptions and undermine their ability to control people's thoughts. This is why an attempt was made to smear the alternative press as "Fake News". The powers that be failed because reality bit them in the arse/ass. When they used the term "Fake News" they overstepped their ability to project propaganda.
For propaganda to work people have to sense that what is being pushed is true. In the case of the US Presidential election many people didn't buy what was being sold. They knew for a fact that the US economy was doing poorly, which was what Trump was telling them, and so their gambit - that things were already great - failed. In the 21st Century, facts on the ground still matter. Furthermore, people ARE turning online to discover things for themselves. Everything is online. People are directly connected via their smart phones. This is the new reality. People don't even have to go searching when it comes to gaining insights on politically charged issues either, especially as social media puts contradictory information right in their laps.
The alternative media in the online age has made a mockery of mainstream media's biased narrative, showing up their ties to corporate and military-industrial interests. It is no wonder that their smear of "Fake News" was easily turned against them.
Spook
Related:
The Truth About Fake News - PJW
Alternative to What? The BFP Roundtable Dissects the "Alternative" Media
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 10th, 2017.]
MSNBC, New York Times Make Hit Piece Against YouTuber ET Williams, Possibly Got His Channel Deleted
Just when you think that the mainstream media can’t get any lower, any dirtier, any grimier… they prove you wrong. Every single time. This time is no different. They have attacked conservative YouTuber E.T. Williams. He is very popular on YouTube and claims to have amassed over 200 million views over the course of 8 years. What sparked this whole situation is a writer for the New York Times by the name of Kevin Roose writing an article that centered around him. Not only was the article at hit piece against Williams, it was also a hit piece against people who talk about news on YouTube. Maybe the piece was a hit on YouTube itself.
In the article, Roose describes E.T. Williams and other YouTubers as a “conservative shock jocks” who peddle “false stores.” The crux of the piece actually centers around YouTube itself and how they allow people like Williams - and others - to exist. He brings up the issue of YouTube’s algorithim… saying that YouTubers “game” the system by being very quick to upload reactions (what he refers to many times as “conspiracy theories”), before “reputable news sources” do.
MSNBC and New York Times represent the old media. So it seems natural that Kevin Roose goes on national TV with Chris Hayes to discuss the article. Many inflammatory terms were used. The aforementioned “shock jock” … “misinformation” … “false speculation” (a term that doesn’t make any sense) and much more. Roose did speak to Williams on the phone before he penned his hit piece… but he did not have him on the MSNBC show alongside him and Chris Hayes to really talk about the issues. The worst part about it all is that it seemed like Roose got a feeling of joy about feeling responsible for E.T. Williams’ channel taken down. Sounds like hate and sure looks like it.
MSNBC, New York Times Make Hit Piece Against YouTuber ET Williams, Possibly Got His Channel Deleted
MSNBC, New York Times Make Hit Piece Against YouTuber ET Williams, Possibly Got His Channel Deleted
Wednesday, November 8, 2017
The Moron Media Is Still Clinging to the Russian DNC Leak Lie
The Moron Media Is Still Clinging to the Russian DNC Leak Lie
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
The View Panel Refuses To Allow Meghan McCain To Talk About Hillary Clinton
The View Panel Refuses To Allow Meghan McCain To Talk About Hillary Clinton
Related:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/search?q=criminal+hillary
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
MSNBC's Joy Reid & Panel Lie About Donna Brazile & Democratic Primary
MSNBC's Joy Reid & Panel Lie About Donna Brazile & Democratic Primary
Related:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/search?q=rigged+primaries
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
CNN "Fish Feeding" Story Goes FULL LIBTARD 😂
CNN "Fish Feeding" Story Goes FULL LIBTARD 😂
Related:
20 CNN Fake News Compilation! (PROOF) by debunkerbuster
CNN's greatest "Fake news" Compilation... by debunkerbuster
CNN Owned Compilation #1 by debunkerbuster
‘Fake News’ Being Weaponized To Censor Infowars
The House Intelligence Committee grilled tech industry leaders including Google and Twitter over “Russian interference” in social media during the 2016 Election, citing Infowars as a main culprit of “fake news.” Paul Joseph Watson joins Alex Jones to break it down.
‘Fake News’ Being Weaponized To Censor Infowars
‘Fake News’ Being Weaponized To Censor Infowars
Monday, November 6, 2017
CNN Makes Up Fake Story About Trump Dumping Food Into A Koi Pond Haphazardly in Japan #KoiGate
President Trump and Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe carried on an old tradition of feeding carp at a Koi pond in Tokyo when CNN and the rest of the mainstream media decided to twist the narrative to make Trump appear like a buffoon.
Liberal network CNN ran a ridiculous headline, “Trump feeds fish, winds up pouring entire box of food into Koi pond,” complete with a misleading tweet from reporter Veronica Rocha that only shows the Trump dumping the entire box of food. Her footage is conveniently edited to skip Abe doing the same thing.
IN fact, Abe dumped his entire box of fish food into the pond and Trump followed while the Prime Minister of Japan smiled. However, the anti-Trump media has been cropping the video to only show Trump’s actions.
Liberal network CNN ran a ridiculous headline, “Trump feeds fish, winds up pouring entire box of food into Koi pond,” complete with a misleading tweet from reporter Veronica Rocha that only shows the Trump dumping the entire box of food. Her footage is conveniently edited to skip Abe doing the same thing.
IN fact, Abe dumped his entire box of fish food into the pond and Trump followed while the Prime Minister of Japan smiled. However, the anti-Trump media has been cropping the video to only show Trump’s actions.
CNN Makes Up Fake Story About Trump Dumping Food Into A Koi Pond Haphazardly in Japan #KoiGate
Saturday, November 4, 2017
David Knight Breaks Down the Clinton Russian Collusion Uranium One Scandal - Desperate Cover Up: MSNBC's Joy Reid Outright Lies About Uranium One & Hillary Clinton
David Knight Breaks Down the Clinton Russian Collusion Uranium One Scandal - Desperate Cover Up: MSNBC's Joy Reid Outright Lies About Uranium One & Hillary Clinton
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
Friday, November 3, 2017
Man Yells "CNN is Fake News" at Anderson Cooper 😂
Man Yells "CNN is Fake News" at Anderson Cooper 😂
Friday, October 27, 2017
MSNBC Ignores Clinton Scandals & Makes Up Fake News About Trump & Wikileaks
RocketSurgeon 4 hours ago
So.. if you hire a caterer.. and they try to unsuccessfully buy Russian caviar from a wholesaler.. then you yourself are colluding with Russia? That is the basic claim, right? A business entity you hired to work for you, wanted to work (but couldn't) with some other business.. who might have at one time sold Russian produced goods to completely different people. And THAT is somehow bombshell evidence? ..and they're even using the "we have no evidence of ANY of these things we claim, which is evidence that it's real, because people always hide the evidence".. the state of modern "journalism" really makes me want to cry sometimes.
MSNBC Ignores Clinton Scandals & Makes Up Fake News About Trump & Wikileaks
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
Thursday, October 26, 2017
Fake media and Hilary supporter, aren't you embarrassed?
Fake media and Hilary supporter, aren't you embarrassed?
Related:
Bullsh*t 'Russian Collusion' Narrative Collapses - Mueller Invested In Hedge Fund Linked To Russia, DNC Funded Fake Dossier - Clinton and the DNC Funded the Russia Dossier: There Goes the Russia Narrative!:
http://mindtreasury.blogspot.com/2017/10/mueller-invested-in-hedge-fund-linked.html
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
Breaking News: DNC + Clinton Campaign Paid For Fake Russia/Trump Dossier - Clinton & DNC Paid for Fake Trump Dossier - Ingraham: 'This is HUGE! Hillary paid for Kremlin designed Trump dossier to win election
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
The Pizzamen Are Still Free & Donald Trump Is Angry!
Related:
JM Talboo & Natasha Republican Lifecoach - Fake News, Wiretapping Scandal, Pedogate:
https://truthtellersradio.blogspot.com/2017/09/jm-talboo-natasha-republican-lifecoach.html
Thursday, October 19, 2017
Insane: Young Turks Defend Fake News Corporate Media, Claims They Don't Make Up Stories
Insane: Young Turks Defend Fake News Corporate Media, Claims They Don't Make Up Stories
American Pravda, NYT Part IV: New York Times Company Culture Revealed: "Everyone hates Trump"
American Pravda, NYT Part IV: New York Times Company Culture Revealed: "Everyone hates Trump"
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com
Wednesday, October 18, 2017
CNN Mocks Trump For Helping Polio Survivor Up Stairs
One of CNN's scumbag reporters mocked President Trump for helping Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who is a polio survivor up some stairs at the White House following a meeting at the Rose Garden. The "reporter" was completely clueless as to McConnell's illness and how it affects him. http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/...
CNN Mocks Trump For Helping Polio Survivor Up Stairs
Related:
CNN Mocks Trump For Helping Polio Survivor Up Stairs
Related:
Tuesday, October 17, 2017
Evidence Emerges that Russians Helped Hillary Clinton's Campaign, CNN Spins Story To Give False Impression They Were Helping Trump
CNN Blames Pokémon Go for Hillary Losing Election!
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities
Thursday, October 12, 2017
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Promotes Daily Beast Fake News Article Attacking Youtubers
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Promotes Daily Beast Fake News Article Attacking Youtubers
YouTube's "Fake News" Editor OUTED; Bitcoin Skyrocketing
YouTube's "Fake News" Editor OUTED; Bitcoin Skyrocketing
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
CNN Achieves Ultimate Fake News Status, Claims George Soros Was Not A Nazi Collaborator
CNN Achieves Ultimate Fake News Status, Claims George Soros Was Not A Nazi Collaborator
Fake Newsers Covered Up #HarveyWeinstein Rapes and Refuse to Abandon the Las Vegas Lone Wolf Fantasy
Fake Newsers Covered Up #HarveyWeinstein Rapes and Refuse to Abandon the Las Vegas Lone Wolf Fantasy
Related:
Explosive Harvey Weinstein PREDATOR Claims; Is Pizzagate Still "Fake"? - John Podesta is a Bad Man:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/10/explosive-harvey-weinstein-predator.html
Truth Teller's Radio Episode 7 - Las Vegas 2nd Gunman, Liberation from the Media, and Trumped!: How Tweets, Trolls, and Memes Won the Presidency for Donald Trump:
https://truthtellersradio.blogspot.com/2017/10/las-vegas-2nd-gunman-liberation-from.html
Friday, October 6, 2017
Tuesday, October 3, 2017
Saturday, September 30, 2017
CNN Finally Discovers ‘Proof’ of Russia Connection 😂 - The Latest Preposterous Russian Witch Hunt by the Sockpuppet Deep State Fake News Media
A U.S. House committee investigating whether Russia has tried to influence U.S. public opinion on fossil fuels asked Facebook (FB.O), Twitter (TWTR.N) and Alphabet (GOOGL.O) on Wednesday to turn over information about Russian entities that may have bought anti-fracking advertisements. One of the thousands of political ads purchased by Russian groups during the 2016 election was a Black Lives Matter ad that targeted residents of Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland, CNN reported Wednesday. The ad, which reportedly ran on Facebook in late 2015 or early 2016, was designed to look as if it supported the Black Lives Matter movement. What?!
CNN Finally Discovers ‘Proof’ of Russia Connection 😂 - The Latest Preposterous Russian Witch Hunt by the Sockpuppet Deep State Fake News Media
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities
Who is Criticizing Black Lives Matter?
Thursday, September 28, 2017
Clinton Collusion: Corporate Media Coordinates Fake New About Jared Kushner's Emails
Corporate Media Coordinates Fake New About Jared Kushner's Emails
Friday, September 22, 2017
CNN FACES POTENTIAL CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT OVER ‘FAKE NEWS’
Group plans class action lawsuit to take down CNN once and for all
Ohio-based attorney Joni Turner and others are planning to file a class action lawsuit against the discredited media giant CNN for “fake news, defamation, targeting, and bullying.”
In a video published to YouTube on Aug. 20, Turner said that such action has “never been done before” and will require four to five thousand people.
To make it work Turner plans on using “menacing” and “cyberbullying” laws to go after the so-called “bonafide news organization” in federal court and ultimately the Supreme Court.
As of September 6, 2017, over 25,000 people have already opted to join the “Takedown of Faketown,” which vows to “legally go after CNN… using every avenue available” in order to “hold them accountable.”
“You get into federal court by a couple of ways,” the attorney explained. “One of the most common ways is that the plaintiff that is suing is in a different state than the defendant and you are suing for more than $50,000. Okay, well we meet that threshold so we can get into federal court with this.”
According to Turner, the group plans on legally “calling out” CNN “for their destruction of not only the news but their destruction of the United States” entirely.
The outspoken attorney claims that CNN has attempted to target Americans by lumping them into “a recognized group.”
“We are a recognized group that are Americans,” she said. “If you’ve got a flag in your front yard you better watch out. Okay, if you’ve got a Trump hat on, or are wearing anything red, white and blue, you better watch out because CNN’s got them coming for us.”
Touching on the subject during her appearance on the Alex Jones Show Thursday, Turner told listeners, “Make no doubt about it, they are targeting a group. They have a group specific in mind and then they are funding the wolves that are going to come in. We have no freedom of speech anymore. I have people that are being shot at that have a Trump sticker.”
Touching on the subject during her appearance on the Alex Jones Show Thursday, Turner told listeners, “Make no doubt about it, they are targeting a group. They have a group specific in mind and then they are funding the wolves that are going to come in. We have no freedom of speech anymore. I have people that are being shot at that have a Trump sticker.”
Turner also expressed great disdain for CNN anchor Don Lemon and liberal filmmaker Michael Moore, who Turner said essentially called Trump a “rapist” and Trump supporters “accomplices to rape” during a taped CNN segment three weeks ago.
Turner said that’s when she felt she needed to take action.
“This is huge. It’s not just a small case,” she said. “We have twenty-five-thousand, and those are singular people who have signed up… These people have given their full names, their addresses, and their phone numbers. These people aren’t messing around. They’re not putting on burkas or covering up their faces [they are like] here’s my phone number, here’s where we live and we are coming after you CNN.”
“It’s time that our legal system gets on the ball,” the attorney also stated.
Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist, analyst, and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified(2013). Shepard is a regular contributor to Infowars. Read more from Shep’s World. Follow Shep onFacebook and Twitter.
Thursday, September 14, 2017
Amazon deletes 1-star reviews of Hillary Clinton's book What Happened - Hillary Clinton Alternate Nostril Breathing Demonstration 😂
Amazon has been monitoring and deleting reviews after Hillary Clinton's new book was greeted with a torrent of criticism on the day it was released.
What Happened, which covers the former Secretary of State's unsuccessful election campaign against Donald Trump, was published on Tuesday. Clinton and her publisher Simon & Schuster claimed the book would offer a candid account of her failure and her own reflection on it.
jdedad 1 day ago
Www.Fakespot.com gives Amazon link to book F grade highly fake reviews
Related:
Hillary's Book Reduced Before Debut - 40% Off = Fake BestSeller - Hillary Clinton Attacks Alex Jones Again In New Book: Video Excerpts - Hillary Not Doing Well on New Book Tour 😂 - Hillary Clinton Once Again Rants Moronically About Trump and Russia - “DON’T GIVE A F*CK” BOOK OUTSELLING HILLARY’S “WHAT HAPPENED”
AFTER TRUMP TWEETS, AMAZON MARKET VALUE DROPS $5 BILLION - Minimum Wage And Amazon Will Destroy the US Economy
Better Book!!!
“Money and Politics” - Peter Schweizer Author... by debunkerbuster
Amazon deletes 1-star reviews of Hillary Clinton's book What Happened - Hillary Clinton Alternate Nostril Breathing Demonstration 😂
What Happened, which covers the former Secretary of State's unsuccessful election campaign against Donald Trump, was published on Tuesday. Clinton and her publisher Simon & Schuster claimed the book would offer a candid account of her failure and her own reflection on it.
jdedad 1 day ago
Www.Fakespot.com gives Amazon link to book F grade highly fake reviews
Related:
Hillary's Book Reduced Before Debut - 40% Off = Fake BestSeller - Hillary Clinton Attacks Alex Jones Again In New Book: Video Excerpts - Hillary Not Doing Well on New Book Tour 😂 - Hillary Clinton Once Again Rants Moronically About Trump and Russia - “DON’T GIVE A F*CK” BOOK OUTSELLING HILLARY’S “WHAT HAPPENED”
AFTER TRUMP TWEETS, AMAZON MARKET VALUE DROPS $5 BILLION - Minimum Wage And Amazon Will Destroy the US Economy
Better Book!!!
“Money and Politics” - Peter Schweizer Author... by debunkerbuster
Amazon deletes 1-star reviews of Hillary Clinton's book What Happened - Hillary Clinton Alternate Nostril Breathing Demonstration 😂
Sunday, September 10, 2017
Monday, September 4, 2017
Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org Debunks the Russian Hacking Narrative - Corporate Media Brings Back Election "May" Have Been "Hacked", "Possibly" By Russia Narrative
Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org Debunks the... by debunkerbuster
Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org Debunks the... by debunkerbuster
Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities
Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org Debunks the Russian Hacking Narrative - Corporate Media Brings Back Election "May" Have Been "Hacked", "Possibly" By Russia Narrative
Killing Bigfoot Can Land You in Jail? Debunking the Fake News of Wochit Entertainment and National Geographic
Pompous reporters for Wochit Entertainment and National Geographic assert without a single citation to back up their statement that Bigfoot is a fictional creature. A single link is not too much to ask for a journalist making such a presumptuous statement. I will give you my choice for a link and challenge these fake news purveyors (debunking the lies of National Geographic is something I'm quite familiar with) to add one single source to back up their claim. Here is mine: http://undebunkingbigfoot.blogspot.com/2014/02/best-evidence-for-existence-of.html. Now please add one to your pages and we'll see which one, and the material it references, that people find most convincing, shall we?
In Skamania County, Washington, which considers itself a Bigfoot refuge a 1984 law states that killing the mythical ape-like creature can get you a year in jail, a $1,000 fine or both. Even though Bigfoot is fictional, the Animal Legal Defense Fund included it on their list of animals who people cannot harm without repercussion. The fund states that Bigfoot is on the list because it points to the larger commonalities” between people and other animals.” http://news.nationalgeographic.com/20... http://www.wochit.com
Even though Bigfoot is fictional (sorry, cryptozoologists), the defense fund included it on their list because “we feel [it] points to the larger commonalities” between people and other animals, Rosengard says. (Read about a Bigfoot sighting in Yellowstone.)
In other words, we and our wild kin are all sentient creatures that deserve legal protection.
Bigfoot cannot "point towards larger commonalities" between mankind and animals unless it is real if you ask me. This may very well be the belief of those that made the law who just didn't want to come right out and say it because of the ridicule factor that these two reports are ignorantly further propagating. This isn't just my opinion, but an educated guess based on the fact that other such laws have admittedly been implemented because of the view of those who drafted them that the evidence is compelling...
Oregon Legislative Assembly—1977 Regular Session House Joint Resolution 52 Sponsored by Representative (later Governor) Kulongoski (at the request of Anita Paulsen)
Notwithstanding that Sasquatch are reputed to live in Devil’s Club swamps and feed on poison oak, there are those who insist on searching for them. Although no one has positively identified or captured one, this Legislative Assembly feels that it is a matter of time before this event will occur.
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2012/07/protecting-sasquatch
In another piece of dishonest reporting at mentalfloss.com the author goes through some mental gymnastics to fit his bias when they write:
The first place to outlaw Bigfoot slaughter explicitly was Skamania County, Washington. In 1969, two years after the release of the controversial Patterson-Gimlin film, the county found itself caught in the heat of peak Bigfoot fever. Believers flooded the Pacific Northwest with plans to track down the stealthy beast—and, as the Board of County Commissioners soon noticed, many visitors brought dangerous hunting weapons with them. Not only did this pose a risk to potential Bigfoots, but it also threatened the residents living in these supposed Sasquatch hotspots. More concerned with the safety of the latter than the former, the commissioners passed an official ordinance [PDF] stating that slaying Bigfoot was a felony punishable by up to five years in prison.
What else besides bias can explain the Bizarro World-esque inversion of reality of claiming the commissioners were "more concerned with the safety of the latter than the former" when the document itself clearly puts the former (the compelling evidence for Bigfoot) front and center before mentioning the weapons. The document does not support the assertion that the existence of the creature was not a real concern and simply added to the document as a means to an end. To the contrary, the order in which the concerns are laid out and more importantly the wording chosen, starting right off the bat with "evidence continues to accumulate indicating the possible existence... of a ape-like nocturnal primate." Noting an influx of scientific investigators before mentioning "believers" or casual hunters, and declaring the Sasquatch an endangered species, is another indication that the lawmakers were being fair and lending the credence to the subject that they thought it deserved.
More:
http://www.skamaniacounty.org/ordinance/Ord_1984-2.pdf
In 1991 a nearby area in Washington, Whatcom County, drafted very similar legislation, which again started out by citing evidence before getting into concerns about weapons. This time much more emphasis was put on the evidence making it even clearer that the law makers did indeed find the evidence persuasive...
Undiscovered Species Protection Act
Whereas, there is evidence to indicate the possible existence of an undiscovered species a primate mammal variously described as Bigfoot, Sasquatch, an ape-like creature or a subspecies of Homo Sapiens. Whereas, reported recent and past sightings, research by anthropologist, Primatologist, biologist, forensic experts, cryptozooligst, independent organizations, private individuals and the famous chimpanzee researcher Jane Goodall support this possibility.
I added the links in the above paragraph with info to back-up what is being stated.
Source: Big Government. Small Brains. Dumb Laws. http://www.dumblaws.com/law/1917
As I've noted in the past these self-proclaimed Bigfoot debunkers are better off pretending (as they seemingly often do) that such individuals don't exist!
Serious researchers will be aware that such laws are not very surprising given the fact that so many front line legal experts, otherwise known as police officers, have reportedly had encounters with these so-called fictional beasts.
http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3993&context=jclc
As an anonymous hunter sums it up:
I'm sorry but every single hunter, police officer, and other professions dedicated to observing details and analytical indetification throughout the last 250 years aren't misidentifying bears as something unknown. Does misidetifiation occur? Yes but not at the rate the debunkers claim. Regardless if the actual truth occurs at only the most minimal rate, there is still a certain degree of something unknown existing. I've personally taken dozens of specimens of dozens of species of wildlife in the past 25 years of hunting across several states. Granted, I've never experienced an unknown creature, never have I witnessed a bear in any situation where it could be misidentified as a naturally bipedal, shaggy haired, 8 foot tall, hominin. For me to lay the assertion out the people much more trained and experienced than I am, in somewhere I've never been, at a high rate are misidentifying bear as an ape man is way too much. Not everyone thinks in darker ways either. - http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2013/07/listen-to-last-nights-coast-to-coast-am.html?showComment=1373608459192#c7776496416280399501
Those who when it comes to this subject or other taboo topics are dismissive out of hand, insulting, condescending, who mock and sneer, etc., are usually misinformed/ignorant pseudo-skeptics. Even if they are right about the existence of Sasquatch, they are still engaging in horrendous journalism. They are many times nearly clueless about the extent and quality of the existing evidence, the minutia, the DNA studies, the peer-reviewed papers. If they are right, it is only because the happen to be. It isn't because they did their due-diligence and came to a conclusion. If they are wrong, we who simply say the evidence is compelling and worthy of study, will laugh in their face if they are ever proven so. I wonder how many of them choose to engage the subject in the manner that they do (not that they don't think it's real but the way they go about letting you know) because they are not very nice people. The type that must ridicule, humiliate or demean others to inflate their own egos.
In Skamania County, Washington, which considers itself a Bigfoot refuge a 1984 law states that killing the mythical ape-like creature can get you a year in jail, a $1,000 fine or both. Even though Bigfoot is fictional, the Animal Legal Defense Fund included it on their list of animals who people cannot harm without repercussion. The fund states that Bigfoot is on the list because it points to the larger commonalities” between people and other animals.” http://news.nationalgeographic.com/20... http://www.wochit.com
Even though Bigfoot is fictional (sorry, cryptozoologists), the defense fund included it on their list because “we feel [it] points to the larger commonalities” between people and other animals, Rosengard says. (Read about a Bigfoot sighting in Yellowstone.)
In other words, we and our wild kin are all sentient creatures that deserve legal protection.
Bigfoot cannot "point towards larger commonalities" between mankind and animals unless it is real if you ask me. This may very well be the belief of those that made the law who just didn't want to come right out and say it because of the ridicule factor that these two reports are ignorantly further propagating. This isn't just my opinion, but an educated guess based on the fact that other such laws have admittedly been implemented because of the view of those who drafted them that the evidence is compelling...
Oregon Legislative Assembly—1977 Regular Session House Joint Resolution 52 Sponsored by Representative (later Governor) Kulongoski (at the request of Anita Paulsen)
Notwithstanding that Sasquatch are reputed to live in Devil’s Club swamps and feed on poison oak, there are those who insist on searching for them. Although no one has positively identified or captured one, this Legislative Assembly feels that it is a matter of time before this event will occur.
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2012/07/protecting-sasquatch
In another piece of dishonest reporting at mentalfloss.com the author goes through some mental gymnastics to fit his bias when they write:
What else besides bias can explain the Bizarro World-esque inversion of reality of claiming the commissioners were "more concerned with the safety of the latter than the former" when the document itself clearly puts the former (the compelling evidence for Bigfoot) front and center before mentioning the weapons. The document does not support the assertion that the existence of the creature was not a real concern and simply added to the document as a means to an end. To the contrary, the order in which the concerns are laid out and more importantly the wording chosen, starting right off the bat with "evidence continues to accumulate indicating the possible existence... of a ape-like nocturnal primate." Noting an influx of scientific investigators before mentioning "believers" or casual hunters, and declaring the Sasquatch an endangered species, is another indication that the lawmakers were being fair and lending the credence to the subject that they thought it deserved.
More:
http://www.skamaniacounty.org/ordinance/Ord_1984-2.pdf
In 1991 a nearby area in Washington, Whatcom County, drafted very similar legislation, which again started out by citing evidence before getting into concerns about weapons. This time much more emphasis was put on the evidence making it even clearer that the law makers did indeed find the evidence persuasive...
Undiscovered Species Protection Act
Whereas, there is evidence to indicate the possible existence of an undiscovered species a primate mammal variously described as Bigfoot, Sasquatch, an ape-like creature or a subspecies of Homo Sapiens. Whereas, reported recent and past sightings, research by anthropologist, Primatologist, biologist, forensic experts, cryptozooligst, independent organizations, private individuals and the famous chimpanzee researcher Jane Goodall support this possibility.
I added the links in the above paragraph with info to back-up what is being stated.
Source: Big Government. Small Brains. Dumb Laws. http://www.dumblaws.com/law/1917
As I've noted in the past these self-proclaimed Bigfoot debunkers are better off pretending (as they seemingly often do) that such individuals don't exist!
Serious researchers will be aware that such laws are not very surprising given the fact that so many front line legal experts, otherwise known as police officers, have reportedly had encounters with these so-called fictional beasts.
http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3993&context=jclc
 |
| Police Dash Cam Footage |
I'm sorry but every single hunter, police officer, and other professions dedicated to observing details and analytical indetification throughout the last 250 years aren't misidentifying bears as something unknown. Does misidetifiation occur? Yes but not at the rate the debunkers claim. Regardless if the actual truth occurs at only the most minimal rate, there is still a certain degree of something unknown existing. I've personally taken dozens of specimens of dozens of species of wildlife in the past 25 years of hunting across several states. Granted, I've never experienced an unknown creature, never have I witnessed a bear in any situation where it could be misidentified as a naturally bipedal, shaggy haired, 8 foot tall, hominin. For me to lay the assertion out the people much more trained and experienced than I am, in somewhere I've never been, at a high rate are misidentifying bear as an ape man is way too much. Not everyone thinks in darker ways either. - http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2013/07/listen-to-last-nights-coast-to-coast-am.html?showComment=1373608459192#c7776496416280399501
Those who when it comes to this subject or other taboo topics are dismissive out of hand, insulting, condescending, who mock and sneer, etc., are usually misinformed/ignorant pseudo-skeptics. Even if they are right about the existence of Sasquatch, they are still engaging in horrendous journalism. They are many times nearly clueless about the extent and quality of the existing evidence, the minutia, the DNA studies, the peer-reviewed papers. If they are right, it is only because the happen to be. It isn't because they did their due-diligence and came to a conclusion. If they are wrong, we who simply say the evidence is compelling and worthy of study, will laugh in their face if they are ever proven so. I wonder how many of them choose to engage the subject in the manner that they do (not that they don't think it's real but the way they go about letting you know) because they are not very nice people. The type that must ridicule, humiliate or demean others to inflate their own egos.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)