Monday, August 7, 2023

JOE ROGAN VS BRIAN DUNNING VERY HEATED DEBATE ON WTC 7---9/11 FIREFIGHTER BLOWS WTC 7 COVER-UP WIDE OPEN---STRUCTURAL REEVALUATION OF COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 ON 9/11

  



Joe Rogan Interviewee, Mick West, Discusses 9/11 and Conspiracies with JM Talboo of 911debunkers.blogspot.com


Alex Jones On Joe Rogan Fact Check: Is It True? (Joe Rogan Experience Podcast 2019 Analysis)


Externally Reviewed Open Source (NIST WTC 7 Report Was Neither) University Study Lead by Civil Engineering Professor: Fire Did Not Cause 3rd Tower’s Collapse on 9/11 - All its supporting columns needed to give way at the same time to cause the observed collapse:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/fire-did-not-cause-3rd-towers-collapse.html

Are there more problems with the UAF/Hulsey/AE911Truth WTC7 Draft Report or the NIST WTC 7 Report? You Decide...

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/are-there-more-problems-with.html
level 1
NIST_Report
67 points·1 year ago·edited 1 year ago
I've dissected the official N.I.S.T. report and shared my thoughts for years. I find the report to be 
unscientific and invalid.
  1. N.I.S.T. omitted stiffeners in their analysis
  2. N.I.S.T. omitted shear studs in their analysis
  3. N.I.S.T. omitted steel-plates in their analysis
Their entire collapse theory is based upon models which omitted these crucial elements. 
The worst part is N.I.S.T. refuses to release their finite element model data for peer review:
http://cryptome.org/nist070709.pdf
No one can verify their findings. This makes their entire conclusion invalid. That's why the U.A.F. 
and the civil engineering department created their own FEA. The U.A.F. model data will be open 
to the public once they're complete, making it infinitely more trustworthy.
A former NIST employee of 14 years made his first public appearance this year speaking out 
against the official report with forensic engineer Dr. Leroy Hulsey from UAF:
NIST should openly share all evidence, data, models, computations, and other relevant information

unless specific and compelling reasons are otherwise provided.
—Peter Ketcham, NIST 1997-2011
Peer review is Science 101.
Release all the model data.

Debunking Mick West on Hulsey WTC 7 Report - NIST vs. Reality vs. Hulsey:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/debunking-mick-west-on-hulsey-wtc-7.html

JOE ROGAN VS BRIAN DUNNING VERY HEATED DEBATE ON WTC 7---9/11 FIREFIGHTER BLOWS WTC 7 COVER-UP WIDE OPEN---STRUCTURAL REEVALUATION OF COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 ON 9/11
Posted by at