1. Dr. Jeff Meldrum — Anatomy, Anthropology & Locomotion
Jeff Meldrum is an anthropologist and anatomist at Idaho State University whose specialties include foot morphology, locomotion and the evolution of bipedalism in humans and other primates.
His examination of alleged Sasquatch footprints is particularly relevant because the evidence falls directly within his areas of expertise.
Meldrum has repeatedly emphasized that his argument is not that the evidence constitutes absolute proof, but that it warrants investigation. His book Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science examines footprints, dermal ridges, photographs, hair, DNA and other evidence.
2. Dr. Jane Goodall — Primatology
Jane Goodall hardly needs an introduction.
The legendary primatologist has publicly expressed an open mind toward the possibility of Sasquatch while acknowledging that existing evidence has not satisfied most scientists.
That's an important distinction.
She isn't saying, “Bigfoot has been proven.”
She's saying the question shouldn't simply be dismissed.
3. Dr. Grover Krantz — Anthropology & Human Evolution
Anthropologist Grover Krantz studied alleged Sasquatch footprints and handprints from an anatomical and evolutionary perspective.
His work included analysis of alleged dermal ridge patterns and the unusual anatomical characteristics claimed in some footprint casts.
Again, agreement with Krantz isn't required.
The relevant fact is that an academically trained anthropologist considered the physical evidence worthy of detailed analysis.
4. Dr. John Bindernagel — Zoology
Canadian zoologist John Bindernagel devoted substantial attention to the possibility of a large, undiscovered North American primate.
His work examined the ecological question of whether such an animal could theoretically exist in North America and whether the reports deserved scientific investigation.
His work is another example of someone with relevant scientific training treating Sasquatch as a zoological question rather than merely a campfire story.
5. Jimmy Chilcutt — Fingerprint & Primate Dermatoglyphics
Jimmy Chilcutt is particularly interesting because his expertise is directly relevant to one of the strangest categories of alleged Sasquatch evidence: dermal ridges.
Chilcutt worked in law enforcement as a fingerprint examiner and has examined alleged Sasquatch track casts for fingerprint-like ridge patterns.
His conclusions regarding some casts were controversial, but they were based on an area of forensic examination in which he had professional experience. Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science specifically discusses his examination of dermal ridge evidence.
6. Dr. Henner Fahrenbach — Hair & Physical Evidence
Dr. Henner Fahrenbach investigated alleged Sasquatch hair and other physical evidence and also conducted statistical work concerning reported Sasquatch characteristics.
Hair attributed to Sasquatch has been subjected to multiple forms of analysis, including DNA testing. Some samples have ultimately been identified as human, which is important evidence against simply assuming every unusual hair represents an unknown animal.
But the existence of the investigations themselves demonstrates that physical samples have been collected and subjected to scientific examination.
7. Dr. Daris Swindler — Primatology & Anatomy
Daris Swindler was a prominent primate anatomist associated with Washington State University.
He examined the controversial Skookum cast, along with other researchers including Meldrum and primatologist Esteban Sarmiento.
Whatever conclusion one reaches about the cast, the fact remains that trained primate specialists were brought in to examine it anatomically.
8. Dr. Esteban Sarmiento — Primatology & Human Evolution
Esteban Sarmiento, a primatologist and researcher associated with the American Museum of Natural History, was another specialist involved in examination of Sasquatch-related physical evidence.
His participation is particularly relevant because primate anatomy and evolution are directly related to evaluating claims of an unknown large primate.
That doesn't make every interpretation of the evidence correct.
It does make the subject difficult to accurately characterize as something that qualified scientists have simply never investigated.
9. Dr. George Schaller — Wildlife Biology
George Schaller is one of the world's most respected wildlife biologists and conservation scientists.
Schaller has expressed skepticism about whether the existing evidence establishes Sasquatch, but he has also recognized the value of critically examining the evidence.
In his comments about Meldrum's work, Schaller described Meldrum as bringing scientific rigor to the question and praised his footprint analysis.
That's an important example because scientific engagement doesn't require accepting the final hypothesis.
10. Dr. Robert Benson — Bioacoustics
Robert Benson examined alleged Sasquatch vocalizations using computerized acoustic analysis.
His area of expertise is particularly relevant to reports involving unexplained sounds and vocalizations.
Again, the existence of an acoustic analysis does not automatically establish that the sounds came from Bigfoot.
But it demonstrates that alleged Sasquatch evidence has been subjected to specialized scientific analysis rather than simply accepted or rejected based on someone's personal opinion.
11. Dr. Craig Newton — DNA Analysis
Craig Newton was involved in DNA testing of biological samples associated with the Skookum site.
The results and limitations of such testing are part of the larger debate over alleged Sasquatch biological evidence.
And this is precisely why DNA evidence needs to be discussed carefully.
Some alleged Sasquatch samples have produced ordinary human or known-animal results. Others have generated questions about contamination, sample quality, identification and interpretation.
That's evidence to investigate—not automatically proof of an unknown primate.
12. Dr. Russell Ciochon — Paleontology & Human Evolution
Russell Ciochon is a paleoanthropologist whose work includes fossil primates and human evolution.
His involvement in Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science provided another perspective on the possible relationship between reports of giant unknown primates and extinct primates such as Gigantopithecus.
This does not mean Gigantopithecus has been demonstrated to be Bigfoot.
It means that questions about unknown or extinct primates can be examined through legitimate disciplines such as paleontology, anatomy and evolutionary biology.
So, the vast majority of relevant qualified scientists not looking for this possible missing link for evolutionary theory they vehemently defend are proving themselves to be quite dogmatic. Maybe pseudoscience is their religion?
Undebunking Bigfoot
Debunking Pseudo-Skepticism Regarding the Topic of Sasquatch
One More Thought...
Some people have suggested that Bigfoot could actually be connected to the Nephilim mentioned in the Bible.
I'm not saying that's true.
But if you're looking for ways to put some of these creationist ideas to rest, perhaps it's time to get on the Bigfoot case ASAP.
After all, if Sasquatch turned out to be a real, previously unknown primate, that would be a pretty damn interesting development for evolutionary science.
So what are we waiting for?
Investigate the Bigfoot. 😂
And Since We're Talking About Bigfoot...
Here are two recent songs from my music featuring lyrics about Bigfoot, along with videos and pictures of me with Bigfoot.
Follow/subscribe on TikTok: @Crashout.Royalty
